2001 Gulf Coast USGS/NASA ATM Lidar-Derived Dune Crest, Toe and Shoreline

Metadata also available as - [Outline] - [Parseable text] - [XML]

Frequently anticipated questions:

What does this data set describe?

Title:
2001 Gulf Coast USGS/NASA ATM Lidar-Derived Dune Crest, Toe and Shoreline
Abstract:
The storm-induced Coastal Change Hazards component of the National Assessment of Coastal Change Hazards (NACCH) project focuses on understanding the magnitude and variability of extreme storm impacts on sandy beaches. Light detection and ranging (lidar)-derived beach morphologic features such as dune crest, toe and shoreline help define the vulnerability of the beach to storm impacts. This dataset defines the elevation and position of the seaward-most dune crest and toe and the mean high-water shoreline derived from the 2001 Gulf Coast U.S. Geological Survey/National Aeronautics and Space Administration (USGS/NASA) Airborne Topographic Mapper (ATM) lidar survey. Beach width is included and is defined as the distance between the dune toe and shoreline along a cross-shore profile. The beach slope is calculated using this beach width and the elevation of the shoreline and dune toe.
  1. How might this data set be cited?
    Doran, Kara S., Long, Joseph W., Stockdon, Hilary F., Birchler, Justin J., Hardy, Matthew W., and Torres, Miguel Loubriel, 20230822, 2001 Gulf Coast USGS/NASA ATM Lidar-Derived Dune Crest, Toe and Shoreline:.

    This is part of the following larger work.

    Doran, Kara S., Long, Joseph W., Birchler, Justin J., Brenner, Owen T., Hardy, Matthew W., Morgan, Karen L.M., Stockdon, Hilary F., and Torres, Miguel Loubriel, 20170805, Lidar-derived Beach Morphology (Dune Crest, Dune Toe, and Shoreline) for U.S. Sandy Coastlines: U.S. Geological Survey data release doi:10.5066/F7GF0S0Z, U.S. Geological Survey - St. Petersburg Coastal and Marine Science Center, St. Petersburg, Florida.

    Online Links:

  2. What geographic area does the data set cover?
    West_Bounding_Coordinate: -97.1412
    East_Bounding_Coordinate: -84.3337
    North_Bounding_Coordinate: 30.3977
    South_Bounding_Coordinate: 27.7179
  3. What does it look like?
  4. Does the data set describe conditions during a particular time period?
    Beginning_Date: 09-Sep-2001
    Ending_Date: 13-Oct-2001
    Currentness_Reference:
    ground condition
  5. What is the general form of this data set?
    Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: tabular digital data
  6. How does the data set represent geographic features?
    1. How are geographic features stored in the data set?
      This is a Point data set. It contains the following vector data types (SDTS terminology):
      • Point (281514)
    2. What coordinate system is used to represent geographic features?
      Horizontal positions are specified in geographic coordinates, that is, latitude and longitude. Latitudes are given to the nearest 0.0197843295. Longitudes are given to the nearest 0.0229959585. Latitude and longitude values are specified in Decimal degrees. The horizontal datum used is D WGS 1984.
      The ellipsoid used is WGS 1984.
      The semi-major axis of the ellipsoid used is 6378137.0.
      The flattening of the ellipsoid used is 1/298.2572235.
      Vertical_Coordinate_System_Definition:
      Altitude_System_Definition:
      Altitude_Datum_Name: North American Vertical Datum of 1988
      Altitude_Resolution: 0.0001
      Altitude_Distance_Units: meter
      Altitude_Encoding_Method: Attribute values
  7. How does the data set describe geographic features?
    01LTS02_morphology.csv
    Dune crest, toe and shoreline, beach width and mean beach slope. See the accompanying data dictionary (Data dictionary for lidar.docx) for more details about the numbering system for the state, segment, and profile fields. (Source: USGS)
    state
    State segment file identification (ID) number. (Source: USGS)
    Range of values
    Minimum:1
    Maximum:6
    segment
    Segment ID number (Source: USGS)
    Range of values
    Minimum:1
    Maximum:121
    profile
    Grid row number corresponding to a cross-shore profile location. (Source: USGS)
    Range of values
    Minimum:1
    Maximum:4823
    lon
    Feature location longitude (WGS84). (Source: USGS)
    ValueDefinition
    999Null value
    Range of values
    Minimum:-97.1412
    Maximum:-84.3337
    Units:decimal degrees
    lat
    Feature location latitude (WGS84). (Source: USGS)
    ValueDefinition
    999Null value
    Range of values
    Minimum:27.7179
    Maximum:30.3977
    Units:decimal degrees
    x
    Cross-shore feature location. (Source: USGS)
    ValueDefinition
    999Null value
    Range of values
    Minimum:-753.737
    Maximum:756.3588
    Units:meters
    z
    Feature elevation (NAVD88). For shorelines, it is the mean-high water elevation. (Source: USGS)
    ValueDefinition
    999Null value
    Range of values
    Minimum:0.0645
    Maximum:17.7854
    Units:meters
    x_err
    95% confidence interval for the cross-shore shoreline position (NAVD88). (Source: USGS)
    ValueDefinition
    999Null value
    Range of values
    Minimum:0
    Maximum:3.8442
    Units:meters
    z_err
    Root mean squared vertical error of dune crest (NAVD88). (Source: USGS)
    ValueDefinition
    999Null value
    Range of values
    Minimum:0
    Maximum:6.3206
    Units:meters
    beach_width
    Distance between dune toe and shoreline (NAVD88). (Source: USGS)
    ValueDefinition
    999Null value
    Range of values
    Minimum:2.2371
    Maximum:667.0741
    Units:meters
    slope
    Mean beach slope calculated between dune toe and shoreline (NAVD88). (Source: USGS)
    ValueDefinition
    999Null value
    Range of values
    Minimum:0.0005
    Maximum:0.4147
    Units:radians
    feature_type
    An identifier for the type of feature in the table entry. (Source: USGS)
    ValueDefinition
    DCDune Crest
    DTDune Toe
    SLShoreline
    Entity_and_Attribute_Overview:
    The detailed attribute descriptions for the state, segment, and profile fields are included in an accompanying data dictionary (Data dictionary for lidar.docx). These metadata are not complete without this file.
    Entity_and_Attribute_Detail_Citation:
    The entity and attribute information were generated by the individual and/or agency identified as the originator of the dataset. Please review the rest of the metadata record for additional details and information.

Who produced the data set?

  1. Who are the originators of the data set? (may include formal authors, digital compilers, and editors)
    • Kara S. Doran
    • Joseph W. Long
    • Hilary F. Stockdon
    • Justin J. Birchler
    • Matthew W. Hardy
    • Miguel Loubriel Torres
  2. Who also contributed to the data set?
  3. To whom should users address questions about the data?
    U.S. Geological Survey
    Attn: Hilary F. Stockdon
    600 4th Street South
    Saint Petersburg, FL
    UNITED STATES

    727-502-8074 (voice)
    727-502-8001 (FAX)
    hstockdon@usgs.gov

Why was the data set created?

To provide data on the morphology of U.S. sandy beaches. Data were collected during USGS field activity number (FAN) 01LTS02; additional survey details are available on the Coastal and Marine Geoscience Data Systems (CMGDS), at https://cmgds.marine.usgs.gov/fan_info.php?fan=01LTS02.

How was the data set created?

  1. From what previous works were the data drawn?
    01LTS02 (source 1 of 1)
    United States Geological Survey (USGS), National Aeronautics & Space Administration (NASA), 20160523, 2001 USGS/NASA Airborne Topographic Mapper (ATM) Lidar: Coastal Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi, Texas.

    Online Links:

    Type_of_Source_Media: Online digital data
    Source_Contribution:
    A lidar survey that was used to estimate dune morphology variables.
  2. How were the data generated, processed, and modified?
    Date: 2016 (process 1 of 2)
    Elevation data points from the lidar survey were interpolated in MATLAB 2014a to a gridded domain (segment) that was rotated parallel to the shoreline and had a resolution of 10 m in the longshore direction and 2.5 m in the cross-shore direction. The interpolation method applies spatial filtering with a Hanning window that is twice as wide as the grid resolution. Dune crest, toe and shoreline were extracted from the elevation grid in MATLAB every 10 m alongshore (each grid row is a profile). For more details on feature extraction see Stockdon and others (2012). The dataset was then converted to a comma-separated values file (.csv) for publication in this data release (Doran and others, 2017). Data sources used in this process:
    • 01LTS02
    Data sources produced in this process:
    • 01LTS02_morphology.csv
    Date: 2023 (process 2 of 2)
    Version 5.0 update: Some data points were originally reported in the wrong geographic location. These erroneous data points were corrected by re-projecting into Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) Easting and Northing coordinates using corrected UTM Zone 16N and then converting back to geographic coordinates (WGS84) using MATLAB (version 2021a). The dataset was then re-converted back into a comma-separated values file (.csv) for publication in this data release (Doran and others, 2017). Please see the version_history.txt file for more information. Data sources produced in this process:
    • 01LTS02_morphology.csv
  3. What similar or related data should the user be aware of?
    Stockdon, H.F., Doran, K.J., Thompson, D.M., Sopkin, K.L., Plant, N.G., and Sallenger, A.H., 20120501, National Assessment of Hurricane-Induced Coastal Erosion Hazards: Gulf of Mexico: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2012-1084, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.

    Online Links:

How reliable are the data; what problems remain in the data set?

  1. How well have the observations been checked?
  2. How accurate are the geographic locations?
    Horizontal accuracy is estimated for shorelines only by calculating the 95% confidence interval of the regression line through the shoreline position and is dependent on foreshore slope, scatter in the lidar data points, and specified lidar point uncertainty. Horizontal coordinates were projected to the World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84) coordinate system with a resolution of 10 meters (m) in the longshore direction and 2.5 m in the cross-shore direction.
  3. How accurate are the heights or depths?
    Vertical accuracy is determined for each dune crest and toe value based upon the scatter of data in the lidar grid cell. Vertical coordinates were projected to the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88) coordinates system with a resolution of 10 centimeters.
  4. Where are the gaps in the data? What is missing?
    This dataset is considered complete for the information presented as described in the abstract section. Users are advised to read the rest of the metadata record carefully for additional details.
  5. How consistent are the relationships among the observations, including topology?
    Morphologic features were reviewed for quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) in ArcMap and edited in MATLAB, as needed. Gaps and anomalies in the data result from data coverage or QA/QC procedures, which are detailed in Stockdon and others (2012).

How can someone get a copy of the data set?

Are there legal restrictions on access or use of the data?
Access_Constraints None
Use_Constraints Public domain data from the U.S. Government are freely redistributable with proper metadata and source attribution. The U.S. Geological Survey requests to be acknowledged as originators of the data in future products or derivative research.
  1. Who distributes the data set? (Distributor 1 of 1)
    U.S. Geological Survey
    Attn: Kara S. Doran
    600 4th Street South
    Saint Petersburg, FL

    727-502-8117 (voice)
    727-502-8001 (FAX)
    kdoran@usgs.gov
  2. What's the catalog number I need to order this data set? 01LTS02_morphology.csv
  3. What legal disclaimers am I supposed to read?
    This digital publication was prepared by an agency of the United States Government. Although these data have been processed successfully on a computer system at the U.S. Geological Survey, no warranty expressed or implied is made regarding the display or utility of the data on any other system, nor shall the act of distribution imply any such warranty. The U.S. Geological Survey shall not be held liable for improper or incorrect use of the data described and (or) contained herein. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof.
  4. How can I download or order the data?

Who wrote the metadata?

Dates:
Last modified: 22-Aug-2023
Metadata author:
U.S. Geological Survey
Attn: Kara S. Doran
600 4th Street South
Saint Petersburg, FL
UNITED STATES

727-502-8117 (voice)
727-502-8001 (FAX)
kdoran@usgs.gov
Metadata standard:
Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata (FGDC-STD-001-1998)
This page is <https://cmgds.marine.usgs.gov/catalog/spcmsc/01LTS02_morphology_metadata.faq.html>
Generated by mp version 2.9.51 on Thu Mar 7 16:21:57 2024