5-Meter Sample Resolution Interferometric Swath Bathymetric Data Collected in 2011 from the Chandeleur Islands, Louisiana (U.S. Geological Survey Field Activity Number 11BIM01)

Metadata also available as - [Outline] - [Parseable text] - [XML]

Frequently anticipated questions:

What does this data set describe?

Title:
5-Meter Sample Resolution Interferometric Swath Bathymetric Data Collected in 2011 from the Chandeleur Islands, Louisiana (U.S. Geological Survey Field Activity Number 11BIM01)
Abstract:
As part of the Barrier Island Evolution Research Project, scientists from the U.S. Geological Survey St. Petersburg Coastal and Marine Science Center conducted nearshore geophysical surveys off the northern Chandeleur Islands, Louisiana, in June of 2011. The overall objectives of the study are to better understand barrier-island geomorphic evolution, particularly storm-related depositional and erosional processes that shape the islands over annual to interannual timescales (1-5 years). Collection of geophysical data will allow us to identify relationships between the geologic history of the island and its present day morphology and sediment distribution. This mapping effort was the first in a series of three planned surveys in this area. High resolution geophysical data collected in each of three consecutive years along this rapidly changing barrier-island system will provide a unique time-series dataset that will significantly further the analyses and geomorphological interpretations of this and other coastal systems, improving our understanding of coastal response and evolution over short time scales (1-5 years). This report serves as an archive of processed interferometric swath and single-beam bathymetry data that were collected during two cruises (USGS Field Activity Numbers 11BIM01 and 11BIM02) along the northern portion of the Chandeleur Islands, Breton National Wildlife Refuge, Louisiana, in June of 2011. Geographic information system data products include a 50 m-cell-size interpolated bathymetry grid surface, trackline maps, and point data files. Additional files include error analysis maps, Field Activity Collection System logs, and formal Federal Geographic Data Committee metadata.
Supplemental_Information:
The swath bathymetry data were collected and processed in the ITRF2005 geodetic reference ellipsoid, whereas the single-beam data were collected and processed in WGS84 (G1150)/ITRF00. Both datasets were subsequently transformed horizontally to NAD83 and then vertically to NAVD88 and MLLW, using the GEOID09 model, with NOAA VDatum version 3.2 transformation software (http://vdatum.noaa.gov/). The final NAD83, NAVD88 x,y,z position data from each survey were merged to generate a digital elevation model with a cell-size resolution of 50 meters.
  1. How might this data set be cited?
    U.S. Geological Survey, 20131231, 5-Meter Sample Resolution Interferometric Swath Bathymetric Data Collected in 2011 from the Chandeleur Islands, Louisiana (U.S. Geological Survey Field Activity Number 11BIM01):.

    Online Links:

    This is part of the following larger work.

    DeWitt, Nancy T., Pfeiffer, William R., Bernier, Julie C., Buster, Noreen A., Miselis, Jennifer L., Flocks, James G., Reynolds, B.J., Wiese, Dana S., and Kelso, Kyle W., 20131231, Coastal Bathymetry Data Collected in 2011 from the Chandeleur Islands, Louisiana: U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 848, U.S. Geological Survey, St. Petersburg, Florida.

    Online Links:

  2. What geographic area does the data set cover?
    West_Bounding_Coordinate: -88.922333
    East_Bounding_Coordinate: -88.788534
    North_Bounding_Coordinate: 30.101670
    South_Bounding_Coordinate: 29.871926
  3. What does it look like?
  4. Does the data set describe conditions during a particular time period?
    Beginning_Date: 02-Jun-2011
    Ending_Date: 16-Jun-2011
    Currentness_Reference:
    ground condition
  5. What is the general form of this data set?
    Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: ASCII
  6. How does the data set represent geographic features?
    1. How are geographic features stored in the data set?
    2. What coordinate system is used to represent geographic features?
  7. How does the data set describe geographic features?
    11BIM01_IFB_ITRF05_xyz.txt
    ASCII text file containing the processed 5-meter resolution interferometric swath bathymetry x,y,z samples in the International Terrestrial Reference Frame of 2005 (ITRF05) geodetic datum. (Source: USGS)
    11BIM01_IFB_NAD83_NAVD88_G09_xyz.txt
    ASCII text file containing the processed 5-meter resolution interferometric swath bathymetry x,y,z samples transformed to the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83) geodetic datum and North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88) orthometric height, derived using the GEOID09 model. (Source: USGS)
    11BIM01_IFB_WGS84_MLLW_xyz.txt
    ASCII text file containing the processed 5-meter resolution interferometric swath bathymetry x,y,z samples transformed to the World Geodetic System of 1984 (WGS84 G1150) geodetic datum and Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW) tidal datum. (Source: USGS)
    ITRF05_X
    ITRF05 x-coordinate (easting) of sample point, in meters (Source: CARIS)
    Range of values
    Minimum:314720.000
    Maximum:327410.000
    Units:meters
    Resolution:0.001
    ITRF05_Y
    ITRF05 y-coordinate (northing) of sample point, in meters (Source: CARIS)
    Range of values
    Minimum:3305985.000
    Maximum:3331525.000
    Units:meters
    Resolution:0.001
    ITRF05_Z
    ITRF05 ellipsoid height of sample point, in meters (Source: CARIS)
    Range of values
    Minimum:-47.729
    Maximum:-28.218
    Units:meters
    Resolution:0.001
    DataType
    Geophysical data type (Source: USGS)
    ValueDefinition
    IFBinterferometric swath bathymetry
    Year
    Year data was collected (Source: USGS) Character string
    Lon_ITRF05
    ITRF05 longitude of sample point, in decimal degrees (Source: VDatum)
    Range of values
    Minimum:-88.922228
    Maximum:-88.788541
    Units:decimal degrees
    Resolution:0.00001
    Lat_ITRF05
    ITRF05 latitude of sample point, in decimal degrees (Source: VDatum)
    Range of values
    Minimum:29.871932
    Maximum:30.101676
    Units:meters
    Resolution:0.00001
    NAD83_X
    NAD83 x-coordinate (easting) of sample point, in meters (Source: VDatum)
    Range of values
    Minimum:314720.7184
    Maximum:327410.7151
    Units:meters
    Resolution:0.001
    NAD83_Y
    NAD83 y-coordinate (northing) of sample point, in meters (Source: VDatum)
    Range of values
    Minimum:3305984.3869
    Maximum:3331524.3813
    Units:meters
    Resolution:0.001
    NAVD88_G09
    NAVD88 GEOID09 orthometric height of sample point, in meters (Source: VDatum)
    Range of values
    Minimum:-19.318
    Maximum:0.0984
    Units:meters
    Resolution:0.001
    Lon_NAD83
    NAD83 longitude of sample point, in decimal degrees (Source: VDatum)
    Range of values
    Minimum:-88.922220
    Maximum:-88.788534
    Units:decimal degrees
    Resolution:0.00001
    Lat_NAD83
    NAD83 latitude of sample point, in decimal degrees (Source: VDatum)
    Range of values
    Minimum:29.871926
    Maximum:30.101670
    Units:meters
    Resolution:0.00001
    Lon_WGS84
    WGS84 (G1150) longitude of sample point, in decimal degrees (Source: VDatum)
    Range of values
    Minimum:-88.922228
    Maximum:-88.788541
    Units:decimal degrees
    Resolution:0.00001
    Lat_WGS84
    WGS84 (G1150) latitude of sample point, in decimal degrees (Source: VDatum)
    Range of values
    Minimum:29.871931
    Maximum:30.101676
    Units:meters
    Resolution:0.00001
    MLLW
    MLLW tidal elevation of sample point, in meters (Source: VDatum)
    Range of values
    Minimum:-19.242
    Maximum:-0.0045
    Units:meters
    Resolution:0.001

Who produced the data set?

  1. Who are the originators of the data set? (may include formal authors, digital compilers, and editors)
    • U.S. Geological Survey
  2. Who also contributed to the data set?
    U.S. Geological Survey, Coastal and Marine Geology Program, St. Petersburg Coastal and Marine Science Center
  3. To whom should users address questions about the data?
    U.S. Geological Survey
    Attn: Nancy DeWitt
    Geologist
    600 4th Street South
    St. Petersburg, FL
    USA

    (727) 502-8000 (voice)
    ndewitt@usgs.gov

Why was the data set created?

This zip archive contains the output of processed interferometric swath bathymetry data collected in June 2011 around the northern Chandeleur Islands, Louisiana. The interferometric swath samples are provided as ASCII x,y,z point data with a spatial resolution of 5 meters.

How was the data set created?

  1. From what previous works were the data drawn?
  2. How were the data generated, processed, and modified?
    Date: 08-Jun-2016 (process 1 of 4)
    Swath Bathymetry Acquisition: The interferometric swath bathymetry data were collected aboard the R/V SurveyCat using a SEA SWATHplus-m 234 kHz interferometric sonar system mounted on a sled attached to a rail system fastened between the catamaran hulls allowing the instrument to align directly below the GPS antennae in order to minimize geometry errors. Boat position and motion data were recorded in real time using a CodaOctopus F190R wetpod inertial measurement unit (IMU) mounted underwater between the transducer heads to minimize lever arm geometry errors between the observed depths and associated vessel motion. Real-time corrected positions were acquired via the use of the OmniSTAR HP (High-Precision differential global navigation satellite system) satellite constellation subscription. OmniSTAR HP position correction data and motion data from the IMU were integrated with interferometric soundings in the SWATHplus software package with positional and calibration offsets predefined by a session file (.sxs), allowing for real-time-corrected depths. Prior to deployment, all equipment offsets were surveyed in dry dock with the use of a laser total station. During the survey all swath tracklines were recorded in SEA raw data format (.sxr). A Valeport Mini Sound Velocity Sensor (SVS) was attached to the transducer mount and collected continuous SOS measurements at the depth of the transducers. These values were directly read and incorporated into the SWATHplus acquisition software giving real-time speed of sound at the transducer while underway. In addition, a separate sound velocity profiler (Valeport miniSVP) was used to collect speed of sound profiles (water surface to seafloor) at intervals throughout the survey. Person who carried out this activity:
    U.S. Geological Survey
    Attn: Nancy DeWitt
    Geologist
    600 4th Street South
    St. Petersburg, FL
    USA

    (727) 502-8000 (voice)
    ndewitt@usgs.gov
    Date: 01-Mar-2012 (process 2 of 4)
    Swath Bathymetry Processing: Position data recorded by the Coda-Octopus F190R IMU system were corrected in real time via the OmniSTAR HP differential navigation system. The IMU also applied real-time motion corrections for heave, roll, and pitch to the vertical component of each position fix. The corrected positions were then integrated with the observed bathymetric values to calculate a final ellipsoid height and position representing the elevation of the seafloor with respect to the geodetic reference frame ITRF05 across the swath range. SWATHplus serves as both an acquisition software and initial processing software. Preliminary roll calibration trackline data were collected and processed using Systems Engineering and Assessment, Ltd., SWATHplus and Grid Processor software version 3.7.17. Instrument offset and calibrations values were input into the session file (.sxs), and the raw data files (.sxr) were then processed using the updated system configuration containing roll calibration values, measured equipment offsets, acquisition parameters, navigation and motion from the F190R, SOS at the sonar head, and SVP cast data. Any calibration offsets or acoustic filtering applied in SWATHplus is also written to the processed data file (.sxp), which can then be imported into advanced sounding data processing software such as CARIS HIPS and SIPS. The initial real-time processing datum for the swath and backscatter data was ITRF05, which is the acquisition datum for OmniSTAR HP position and navigation data. All processed data files were imported into CARIS HIPS and SIPS version 7.1, and the original sounding data were edited for outliers using the program's depth filters and reference surfaces. Any remaining outliers were then edited out manually. A CARIS BASE (Bathymetry with Associated Statistical Error) surface with associated CUBE (Combined Uncertainty and Bathymetry Estimator) sample surface was created from the edited soundings dataset. A BASE hypothesis is the estimated value of a grid node representing all the soundings within a chosen resolution or grid-cell size (for example, 5 m) weighted by uncertainty and proximity, giving the final value as a "sample" of the data within the specific grid cell. This algorithm allows for multiple grid-node hypotheses to be verified or overridden by the user, while maximizing processing efficiency. A 5-m resolution CUBE surface was created to perform initial hypothesis editing using the CARIS Subset Editor tool, followed by higher resolution surface detail editing within subset editor. The x,y,z data were exported as ASCII text at a 5 x 5 m sample resolution in the ellipsoid datum of ITRF05. Person who carried out this activity:
    U.S. Geological Survey
    Attn: Nancy DeWitt
    Geologist
    600 4th Street South
    St. Petersburg, FL
    USA

    (727) 502-8000 (voice)
    ndewitt@usgs.gov
    Data sources produced in this process:
    • 11BIM01_IFB_ITRF05_xyz.txt
    Date: 28-Apr-2013 (process 3 of 4)
    Datum transformation: Using the transformation software VDatum version 3.2, the interferometric swath x,y,z samples were transformed horizontally from their data acquisition datum (International Terrestrial Reference Frame of 2005, ITRF05) to the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83) reference frame and the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88) orthometric elevation and Mean Lower Low Water (MLLW) tidal datum using the National Geodetic Survey (NGS) geoid model of 2009 (GEOID09). Person who carried out this activity:
    U.S. Geological Survey
    Attn: Nancy DeWitt
    Geologist
    600 4th Street South
    St. Petersburg, FL
    USA

    (727) 502-8000 (voice)
    ndewitt@usgs.gov
    Data sources produced in this process:
    • 11BIM01_IFB_NAD83_NAVD88_GEOID09_xyz.txt
    Date: 13-Oct-2020 (process 4 of 4)
    Added keywords section with USGS persistent identifier as theme keyword. Person who carried out this activity:
    U.S. Geological Survey
    Attn: VeeAnn A. Cross
    Marine Geologist
    384 Woods Hole Road
    Woods Hole, MA

    508-548-8700 x2251 (voice)
    508-457-2310 (FAX)
    vatnipp@usgs.gov
  3. What similar or related data should the user be aware of?

How reliable are the data; what problems remain in the data set?

  1. How well have the observations been checked?
    The accuracy of the data is determined during data collection. This dataset is from one research cruise and is therefore internally consistent. Methods are employed to maintain data collection consistency aboard the platform. During mobilization, each piece of equipment is isolated to obtain internal and external offset measurements with respect to the survey platform. All the critical measurements are recorded manually and digitally entered into their respective programs. For the interferometric swath bathymetry, offsets between the sonar head and the DGPS antennas were measured and entered into the CodaOctopus F190R internal setup program. Differential Geographic Positioning System (DGPS) was provided through the OmniSTAR High Performance wide-area GPS service. DGPS is always implemented for navigational accuracy either during acquisition or as a post-processing step. These bathymetric data have not been independently verified for accuracy.
  2. How accurate are the geographic locations?
    The 2-sigma (95%) horizontal accuracy of the OmniSTAR HP navigation used during swath bathymetry acquisition, as specified by OmniSTAR, is +/- 10 cm. The Coda Octopus F190R IMU, which integrates the OmniSTAR HP position with motion, measures vessel velocity (manufacturer's specified accuracy +/- 0.014 m/s), roll and pitch (+/- 0.025 degrees), heading (1-m baseline – 0.1 degrees), and heave (5 cm per meter of depth).
  3. How accurate are the heights or depths?
    The 2-sigma (95%) vertical accuracy of the OmniSTAR HP navigation subscription used during swath bathymetry acquisition, as specified by OmniSTAR, is +/-15 cm. The Coda Octopus F190R IMU, which integrates the OmniSTAR HP position with motion, measures vessel velocity (manufacturer's specified accuracy +/- 0.014 m/s), roll and pitch(+/- 0.025 degrees), heading (1 m baseline – 0.1 degrees), and heave (5 cm per meter of depth). The vertical accuracy for the SWATHplus-M system varies with depth and across track range. At 57 m it is accurate to 10 cm vertically. The maximum vertical transformation error reported by VDatum for eastern Louisiana is 17.1 centimeters.
  4. Where are the gaps in the data? What is missing?
    These are complete post-processed x,y,z bathymetry samples with 5-meter spatial resolution derived from acoustic interferometric swath data collected in June 2011 from around the northern Chandeleur Islands.
  5. How consistent are the relationships among the observations, including topology?
    This zip archive contains the post-processed interferometric swath bathymetric data from a single research cruise in June 2011. Refer to the online data series linkage for field logs, vessel platform descriptions, and other survey information.

How can someone get a copy of the data set?

Are there legal restrictions on access or use of the data?
Access_Constraints: None
Use_Constraints:
The U.S. Geological Survey requests that it be referenced as the originator of this dataset in any future products or research derived from these data. These data should not be used for navigational purposes.
  1. Who distributes the data set? (Distributor 1 of 1)
    U.S. Geological Survey
    Attn: Nancy DeWitt
    Geologist
    600 4th Street South
    St. Petersburg, FL
    USA

    (727) 502-8000 (voice)
    ndewitt@usgs.gov
  2. What's the catalog number I need to order this data set? Downloadable Data
  3. What legal disclaimers am I supposed to read?
    This DVD publication was prepared by an agency of the United States Government. Although these data have been processed successfully on a computer system at the U.S. Geological Survey, no warranty expressed or implied is made regarding the display or utility of the data on any other system, nor shall the act of distribution imply any such warranty. The U.S. Geological Survey shall not be held liable for improper or incorrect use of the data described and (or) contained herein. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof.
  4. How can I download or order the data?
  5. What hardware or software do I need in order to use the data set?
    The ASCII text files contained in the .zip archive can be accessed with any standard text file reader.

Who wrote the metadata?

Dates:
Last modified: 13-Oct-2020
Metadata author:
U.S. Geological Survey
Attn: Nancy DeWitt
Geologist
600 4th Street South
St. Petersburg, FL
USA

(727) 502-8000 (voice)
ndewitt@usgs.gov
Metadata standard:
FGDC Content Standards for Digital Geospatial Metadata (FGDC-STD-001-1998)
This page is <https://cmgds.marine.usgs.gov/catalog/spcmsc/11BIM01_IFB_xyz_metadata.faq.html>
Generated by mp version 2.9.50 on Tue Sep 21 18:18:29 2021