Atlantic and Gulf coast sandy coastline topo-bathy profile and characteristic database

Metadata also available as - [Outline] - [Parseable text] - [XML]

Frequently anticipated questions:

What does this data set describe?

Title:
Atlantic and Gulf coast sandy coastline topo-bathy profile and characteristic database
Abstract:
Seamless topographic-bathymetric (topo-bathy) profiles and their derived morphologic characteristics were developed for sandy coastlines along the Atlantic and Gulf coasts of the United States. As such, the rocky coasts of Maine, the coral reefs in southern Florida and the Keys, and the marsh coasts in the Mississippi Delta and the Florida Big Bend region and are not included in this dataset. Topographic light detection and ranging (lidar) data (dune crest, dune toe, and shorelines) from Doran and others (2017) were stitched together with bathymetric data (nearshore slope) from the Continuously Updated Digital Elevation Model (CUDEM, 2014) to generate the seamless topo-bathy profiles. The topo-bathy profiles are published as a database in the Hierarchical Data Format version 5 (HDF5) which contain cross-shore distance coordinates, Universe Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinate system Easting and Northing coordinates, and various morphologic characteristics are provided here. A total of 3,897 topo-bathy profiles are included in the HDF5 database file. For further information regarding generation of these seamless topo-bathy profiles refer to Mickey and Passeri, 2022b.
  1. How might this data set be cited?
    Mickey, Rangley C., and Passeri, Davina L., 20220706, Atlantic and Gulf coast sandy coastline topo-bathy profile and characteristic database: U.S. Geological Survey, St. Petersburg, Florida.

    Online Links:

    This is part of the following larger work.

    Mickey, Rangley C., and Passeri, Davina L., 20220706, Atlantic and Gulf Coast Sandy Coastline Topo-Bathy Profile and Characteristic Database: U.S. Geological Survey - St. Petersburg Coastal and Marine Science Center, St. Petersburg, Florida.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 2022a
  2. What geographic area does the data set cover?
    West_Bounding_Coordinate: -97.998046874696
    East_Bounding_Coordinate: -68.906250000857
    North_Bounding_Coordinate: 43.324859387611
    South_Bounding_Coordinate: 24.526736772137
  3. What does it look like?
  4. Does the data set describe conditions during a particular time period?
    Beginning_Date: 2010
    Ending_Date: 2020
    Currentness_Reference:
    ground condition
  5. What is the general form of this data set?
    Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: HDF5
  6. How does the data set represent geographic features?
    1. How are geographic features stored in the data set?
      This is a Vector data set.
    2. What coordinate system is used to represent geographic features?
      Grid_Coordinate_System_Name: Universal Transverse Mercator
      Universal_Transverse_Mercator:
      UTM_Zone_Number: 14-19
      Transverse_Mercator:
      Scale_Factor_at_Central_Meridian: 0.9996
      Longitude_of_Central_Meridian: -87.0
      Latitude_of_Projection_Origin: 0.0
      False_Easting: 500000.0
      False_Northing: 0.0
      Planar coordinates are encoded using row and column
      Abscissae (x-coordinates) are specified to the nearest 2.3
      Ordinates (y-coordinates) are specified to the nearest 2.3
      Planar coordinates are specified in meters
      The horizontal datum used is North American Datum of 1983.
      The ellipsoid used is Geodectic Reference System 80.
      The semi-major axis of the ellipsoid used is 6378137.0.
      The flattening of the ellipsoid used is 1/298.257222101.
      Vertical_Coordinate_System_Definition:
      Altitude_System_Definition:
      Altitude_Datum_Name: North American Vertical Datum of 1988
      Altitude_Resolution: 0.01
      Altitude_Distance_Units: meters
      Altitude_Encoding_Method: Attribute values
      Depth_System_Definition:
      Depth_Datum_Name: Mean Sea Level
      Depth_Resolution: 0.01
      Depth_Distance_Units: meters
      Depth_Encoding_Method: Attribute values
  7. How does the data set describe geographic features?
    Profile_Data.h5
    HDF5 database file containing 3,897 topo-bathy profiles of U.S. sandy coastlines. Each profile contains the following attributes: cross-shore coordinates, UTM Easting and Northing coordinates, UTM zone, flag for defining which part of profile is from lidar or CUDEM, Total Water Level (TWL) shoreline location (latitude and longitude), topographic lidar retrieval date, cross-shore elevation, datum of shoreline elevation, foredune crest elevation, foredune toe elevation, foredune width, relative height of foredune, foredune volume, beach width, beach volume, beach slope, and nearshore slope. Each profile in the database file is named as "ID_" with a unique, whole number following the underscore. The numbering is in numerical order, starting from 1. (Source: USGS)
    lon
    Longitude of the Total Water Level shoreline location. (Source: USGS)
    Range of values
    Minimum:-97.998046874696
    Maximum:-68.906250000857
    Units:decimal degrees
    lat
    Latitude of the Total Water Level shoreline location. (Source: USGS)
    Range of values
    Minimum:24.526736772137
    Maximum:43.324859387611
    Units:decimal degrees
    date
    Survey date of the topographic lidar data (Doran and others, 2017). (Source: USGS)
    Range of values
    Minimum:2010
    Maximum:2020
    Units:year
    Xshore
    Cross-shore distance coordinate of the topo-bathy profile. (Source: USGS)
    Range of values
    Minimum:0
    Maximum:89000
    Units:meters
    Elevation
    Cross-shore elevation and depth of the topo-bathy profile. (Source: USGS)
    Range of values
    Minimum:-22
    Maximum:89
    Units:meters
    UTM_X
    Cross-shore UTM Easting coordinates of the topo-bathy profile. (Source: USGS)
    Range of values
    Minimum:209448.214496298
    Maximum:809575.690679299
    Units:meters
    UTM_Y
    Cross-shore UTM Northing coordinates of the topo-bathy profile. (Source: USGS)
    Range of values
    Minimum:2464482.61013486
    Maximum:4878112.71387319
    Units:meters
    zdatum
    Elevation of shoreline. (Source: USGS)
    Range of values
    Minimum:0.07
    Maximum:1.22
    Units:meters
    Dhigh
    Elevation of foredune crest. (Source: USGS)
    Range of values
    Minimum:0.8
    Maximum:56
    Units:meters
    Dlow
    Elevation of foredune toe. (Source: USGS)
    Range of values
    Minimum:0.4
    Maximum:26
    Units:meters
    DuneWidth
    Foredune width, measured as distance between the fore dune toe and crest, with the fore dune volume calculated as the sediment volume over the derived fore dune width. (Source: USGS)
    Range of values
    Minimum:0.15
    Maximum:2620
    Units:meters
    DuneRelHeight
    Relative elevation of foredune (Dlow to Dhigh). (Source: USGS)
    Range of values
    Minimum:0.004
    Maximum:52
    Units:meters
    DuneVolume
    Foredune volume, calculated as the sediment volume over the derived fore dune width. (Source: USGS)
    Range of values
    Minimum:0.4
    Maximum:9928
    Units:cubic meters
    BeachWidth
    Beach width, measured as the distance between shoreline location and fore dune toe location. (Source: USGS)
    Range of values
    Minimum:2
    Maximum:4638
    Units:meters
    BeachVolume
    Beach volume, calculated as the volume of sediment over the derived beach width. (Source: USGS)
    Range of values
    Minimum:0
    Maximum:171372
    Units:cubic meters
    BeachSlope
    Slope of the beach, measured as the ratio of the elevation of dune toe above the shoreline elevation over the horizontal distance between shoreline and the fore dune toe (Doran and others, 2017). (Source: USGS)
    Range of values
    Minimum:0.0001
    Maximum:5
    Units:unitless
    NearshoreSlope
    Slope of the nearshore, measured as the ratio of the depth of closure over the horizontal distance between the depth of closure (from Brutsche and others, 2016) and the shoreline. (Source: USGS)
    Range of values
    Minimum:0.0001
    Maximum:0.6
    UTM_zone
    Cross-shore UTM Zone for coordinates of the topo-bathy profile. (Source: USGS)
    Range of values
    Minimum:14
    Maximum:19
    Flag
    Cross-shore flag to indicate if data is either from the lidar or CUDEM bathymetric datasets. (Source: USGS)
    ValueDefinition
    1Lidar data from Doran and others (2017).
    2Bathymetric data from CUDEM (2014).

Who produced the data set?

  1. Who are the originators of the data set? (may include formal authors, digital compilers, and editors)
    • Mickey, Rangley C.
    • Passeri, Davina L.
  2. Who also contributed to the data set?
  3. To whom should users address questions about the data?
    Rangley C Mickey
    Southeast Region: ST. PETE COASTAL & MARINE SC
    Physical Scientist
    600 4Th Street South
    St. Petersburg, FL
    US

    727-502-8115 (voice)
    rmickey@usgs.gov

Why was the data set created?

These data were generated to provide a database of current morphologic profiles and their associated morphologic characteristics for use across multi-disciplinary studies of sandy coastlines along the Atlantic and Gulf U.S. coasts.

How was the data set created?

  1. From what previous works were the data drawn?
    Lidar topography (source 1 of 3)
    Doran, Kara S., Long, Joseph W., Birchler, Justin J., Brenner, Owen T., Hardy, Matthew W., Morgan, Karen L.M., Stockdon, Hilary F., and Loubriel Torres, Miguel, 20170805, Lidar-derived Beach Morphology (Dune Crest, Dune Toe, and Shoreline) for U.S. Sandy Coastlines: US Geological Survey, St. Petersburg, FL.

    Online Links:

    Type_of_Source_Media: data download
    Source_Contribution: Topographic data used for the topo-bathy profile generation
    CUDEM (source 2 of 3)
    Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES) at the University of Colorado, Boulder, 2014, Continuously Updated Digital Elevation Model (CUDEM) - 1/9 Arc-Second Resolution Bathymetric-Topographic Tiles: NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, Boulder, CO.

    Online Links:

    Type_of_Source_Media: data download
    Source_Contribution: Bathymetric data used for the topo-bathy profile generation
    Depth of Closure (source 3 of 3)
    Brutsche, Katherine E., Rosati, James, Pollock, Cheryl E., and McFall, Brian C., 201603, Calculating Depth of Closure Using WIS Hindcast data: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center [Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory], Vicksburg, MS.

    Online Links:

    Type_of_Source_Media: Journal
    Source_Contribution:
    Depth of closure values along the Atlantic and Gulf coasts for calculation of nearshore slope
  2. How were the data generated, processed, and modified?
    Date: 2022 (process 1 of 3)
    The CUDEM topo-bathy data were interpolated to the extended lidar topographic profile coordinates. The original topographic lidar profiles from Doran and others (2017) were then stitched to the CUDEM interpolated profile at the shoreline datum elevation provided for each lidar derived profile. For profiles where the lidar shoreline datum elevation and the corresponding CUDEM shoreline datum elevation did not match in the cross-shore position, the CUDEM bathymetry was shifted shoreward or landward – based on the difference in cross-shore position of the lidar datum elevation. This methodology assumes that while this shifting of bathymetry does not represent the actual morphology and position associated with the lidar topography at that survey date, the stitching of these two temporally different datasets provides a reasonable representation of topo-bathy morphology for 1-dimensional morphologic modeling. The data were processed using MatLab R2016b. Person who carried out this activity:
    Rangley C Mickey
    Southeast Region: ST. PETE COASTAL & MARINE SC
    Physical Scientist
    600 4Th Street South
    St. Petersburg, FL
    US

    727-502-8115 (voice)
    rmickey@usgs.gov
    Date: 2022 (process 2 of 3)
    The fore dune crest and toe elevations and locations, along with shoreline position and elevation were extracted from the lidar datasets published in Doran and others (2017). In some cases, the fore dune crest or toe may not have been previously extracted, and were therefore extracted from the lidar profile following methods provided in Stockdon and others (2012). Beach width (m) was measured as the distance between shoreline location and fore dune toe location. Beach volume (cubic meters) was calculated as the volume of sediment over the derived beach width (m). Fore dune width (m) was measured as the distance (m) between the fore dune toe and crest. The fore dune volume (cubic meters) was calculated as the sediment volume (cubic meters) over the derived fore dune width (m). Nearshore slope was measured as the ratio of the depth of closure (m) over the horizontal distance (m) between the depth of closure from Brutsche and others (2016) and the shoreline. The beach slope was measured as the ratio of the elevation of dune toe above the shoreline elevation over the horizontal distance (m) between shoreline and the fore dune toe (Doran and others, 2017). The data were processed using MatLab R2016b. Person who carried out this activity:
    Rangley C Mickey
    Southeast Region: ST. PETE COASTAL & MARINE SC
    Physical Scientist
    600 4Th Street South
    St. Petersburg, FL
    US

    727-502-8115 (voice)
    rmickey@usgs.gov
    Date: 2022 (process 3 of 3)
    The final dataset of topo-bathy profiles and associated characteristics were exported to the open-source format of Hierarchical Data Format version 5 (HDF5) file using MatLab 2016b provided functions h5create, h5write, and h5 writeatt. All data are provided in a single file and are publicly available in Mickey and Passeri (2022a). Each profile within the HDF5 is considered a ‘group’ and designated by a specific number (syntax example 1: ‘/Profile/ID_1’), while each profile group contains a ‘dataset’ of the profile’s associated topo-bathy elevations (syntax example 1: ‘/Profile/ID_1/Elevation’), coordi-nates, and morphologic characteristics. Subsection 2.1 provides a description of the variables associated with an individual profile (group) within the HDF5 file. Person who carried out this activity:
    Rangley C Mickey
    Southeast Region: ST. PETE COASTAL & MARINE SC
    Physical Scientist
    600 4Th Street South
    St. Petersburg, FL
    US

    727-502-8115 (voice)
    rmickey@usgs.gov
  3. What similar or related data should the user be aware of?
    Doran, Kara S., Long, Joseph W., Birchler, Justin J., Brenner, Owen T., Hardy, Matthew W., Morgan, Karen L.M., Stockdon, Hilary F., and Loubriel Torres, Miguel, 20170805, Lidar-derived Beach Morphology (Dune Crest, Dune Toe, and Shoreline) for U.S. Sandy Coastlines: U.S. Geological Survey data release doi:10.5066/F7GF0S0Z, U.S. Geological Survey - St. Petersburg Coastal and Marine Science Center, St. Petersburg, FL.

    Online Links:

    Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES) at the University of Colorado, Boulder, 2014, Continuously Updated Digital Elevation Model (CUDEM) - 1/9 Arc-Second Resolution Bathymetric-Topographic Tiles: NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, Boulder, CO.

    Online Links:

    St. Petersburg Coastal and Marine Science Center, 2022, Total Water Level and Coastal Change Forecast Viewer: U.S. Geological Survey - St. Petersburg Coastal and Marine Science Center, St. Petersburg, FL.

    Online Links:

    Brutsche, Katherine E., Rosati, James, Pollock, Cheryl E., and McFall, Brian C., 201603, Calculating Depth of Closure Using WIS Hindcast Data: U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center [Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory], Vicksburg, MS.

    Online Links:

    Stockdon, Hilary F., Doran, Kara S., Thompson, David M., Sopkin, Kristin L., Plant, Nathaniel G., and Sallenger, Abbey H., 20120501, National Assessment of Hurricane-Induced Coastal Erosion Hazards: Gulf of Mexico: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2012-1084, US Geological Survey, Reston, VA.

    Online Links:

    van der Westhuysen, Andre J., Padilla-Hernandez, Roberto, Santos, Pablo, Gibbs, Alex, Gaer, Douglas, Nicolini, Troy, Tjaden, Sten, Devaliere, Eve Marie, and Tolman, Hendrick L., 20130108, Development and Validation of the Nearshore Wave Prediction System: American Meteorological Society, Austin, TX.

    Online Links:

    Mickey, Rangley C., and Passeri, Davina L., 20220706, A Database of Topo-Bathy Cross-Shore Profiles and Characteristics for U.S. Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico Sandy Coastlines: MDPI: Data, Basel, Switzerland.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: 2022b

How reliable are the data; what problems remain in the data set?

  1. How well have the observations been checked?
    The profile data attributes were derived from observed lidar topographic data (Doran and others, 2017) except for the nearshore slope, which was derived using the bathymetric dataset from the Continuously Updated Digital Elevation Model (CUDEM, 2014). Each profile and characteristic in the database has been reviewed as part of this publication process, any errors were identified and corrected.
  2. How accurate are the geographic locations?
    The topographic portion of the topo-bathy profiles were extracted directly from lidar data associated with Doran and others (2017). The Continuously Updated Digital Elevation Model bathymetry data were interpolated to an extended coordinate profile (to 20 meters [m] depth), based on locations from Nearshore Wave Prediction System (van der Westhuysen, 2013) generated from the lidar profile coordinates.
  3. How accurate are the heights or depths?
    Vertical datum is in the North American Vertical Datum of 1988 (NAVD88) with an estimated resolution of 0.01 m.
  4. Where are the gaps in the data? What is missing?
    Data set is considered complete for the information presented, as described in the abstract. Users are advised to read the rest of the metadata record carefully for additional details.
  5. How consistent are the relationships among the observations, including topology?
    The topo-bathy profiles were generated by "stitching" observed lidar topography to the Continuously Updated Digital Elevation Model bathymetry. In some instances, these two datasets (bathymetry and lidar) did not align temporally at a particular shoreline. Therefore, adjustments were made to the position of the bathymetry data to ensure that the observed topographic data remained consistent. Refer to Mickey and Passeri (2022b) or the process description section of this metadata record for more details on the stitching methodology.

How can someone get a copy of the data set?

Are there legal restrictions on access or use of the data?
Access_Constraints None
Use_Constraints None
  1. Who distributes the data set? (Distributor 1 of 1)
    Rangley C Mickey
    Southeast Region: ST. PETE COASTAL & MARINE SC
    Physical Scientist
    600 4Th Street South
    St. Petersburg, FL
    US

    727-502-8115 (voice)
    rmickey@usgs.gov
  2. What's the catalog number I need to order this data set?
  3. What legal disclaimers am I supposed to read?
    This digital publication was prepared by an agency of the United States Government. Although these data have been processed successfully on a computer system at the U.S. Geological Survey, no warranty expressed or implied is made regarding the display or utility of the data on any other system, nor shall the act of distribution imply any such warranty. The U.S. Geological Survey shall not be held liable for improper or incorrect use of the data described and (or) contained herein. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof.
  4. How can I download or order the data?
  5. What hardware or software do I need in order to use the data set?
    The user must have software capable of downloading and uncompressing a zip folder and opening a HDF5 file. There are free, open-source applications capable of viewing HDF files, such as HDFView. To learn more and to access HDFView, please visit, https://portal.hdfgroup.org/display/HDF5.

Who wrote the metadata?

Dates:
Last modified: 06-Jul-2022
Metadata author:
Rangley C Mickey
US Geological Survey
Physical Scientist
600 4th Street South
St. Petersburg, FL
USA

7275028115 (voice)
rmickey@usgs.gov
Metadata standard:
Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata (FGDC-STD-001-1998)
This page is <https://cmgds.marine.usgs.gov/catalog/spcmsc/Profile_Database_Metadata.faq.html>
Generated by mp version 2.9.51 on Wed Jul 6 12:20:53 2022