Horizontal_Positional_Accuracy_Report:
Horizontal accuracy is affected by the source data and photogrammetry processing and is difficult to quantitatively test, especially as this is the highest resolution dataset currently available in a very dynamic environment with no surveyed stable features. A cursory qualitative analysis of the UAS orthoimages compared against published ortho images with overlapping extent (Ritchie and others, 2022) indicates the products align well as can be discerned between 2.5-10 cm and 1 meter products. The horizontal root mean square error (RMSE) of the GCPs as reported from the Metashape projects for each site are given here. NP0 GCP (n=5) RMSE was xy: 0.013, 0.018 (m), NP1 GCP (n=3) RMSE was xy: 0.028, 0.032, and NP3 GCP (n=5) RMSE was xy: 0.011, 0.004 (m). These values do not represent the absolute horizontal georeferencing accuracy of the product but provide a better sense of the overall processing accuracy.
Vertical_Positional_Accuracy_Report:
There are no vertical positions associated with these data products, rather the encoded reflectance values in the 5-band multispectral ortho product are evaluated here. The two radiometrically calibrated reflectance tarps visible in the ortho image have known values of 0.48 (light) and 0.12 (dark). The average value of each tarp was evaluated by extracting all the values for each band within the area of each tarp in the 5-band products – the lighter tarp values were consistently lower than published and may be partially due to dirt accumulation over time. The average values of the light tarp, from band 1 to 5, at New Pond 0 were 0.461, 0.481, 0.440, 0.427, 0.443, at New Pond 1 were 0.444, 0.459, 0.449, 0.435, 0.440, and at New Pond 3 were 0.450, 0.447, 0.433, 0.419, 0.426, respectively. The average values of the dark tarp, from band 1 to 5, at New Pond 0 were 0.122, 0.133, 0.125, 0.125, at New Pond 1 were 0.128, 0.125, 0.119, 0.118, and 0.121, and at New Pond 3 0.128, 0.125, 0.124, 0.119, 0.124, respectively.