All cores were transported to the U.S. Geological Survey in St. Petersburg, FL, the day of collection and immediately sectioned. Cores were sectioned on a spinning wheel, which was calibrated to push 1 cm of sediment out of the core top. This interval was removed, placed in a labeled whir-pak bag, weighed (wet weight) and frozen. Samples were shipped frozen overnight to the U.S. Geological Survey in Woods Hole, MA, where all further laboratory analysis was done. All sediment samples were kept frozen (-40 degrees Celsius) until freeze dried. Samples were kept in original sample bags and placed in a freeze dryer for 1 week until constant weight was achieved. Samples were immediately weighed (dry weight). Dry bulk density was determined as the dry weight of a known volume of sample.
Approximately 5 g of dried sediment sample was blended and homogenized prior to sealing in a jar for a minimum of three weeks and then placed on a planar-type gamma counter for 24 to 48 hours to measure 7Be, 137Cs, 210Pb, and 226Ra at 477, 662, 46.5 and 352 kiloelectronvolts (KeV) energies respectively (Canberra Inc., USA). Detector efficiency was determined from EPA standard pitchblende ore in the same geometry as the samples. Activities of 7Be, 137Cs, and 210Pb were decay corrected to time of collection. Suppression of low energy peaks by self-absorption was corrected for according to Cutshall and others, 1983. Peak detection, with respect to background activity, is calculated for each radioisotope in the APTEC software during sample analysis. Generally, measured radioisotope activity greater than or equal to 0.30 (210Pb), 0.20 (226Ra), 0.71 (7Be), and 0.10 (137Cs) dpm/g were accepted as above detection limit for this dataset; values below are reported as 0. Sediment ages and accretion rates were calculated with the continuous rate of supply 210Pb age model, a variant on the advection-decay equation (Appleby and Oldfield, 1978; Goldberg, 1963). This model assumes that 210Pb supply to the sediment surface is constant through time, but allows for changing sedimentation rates, in addition to decay, to control the down-core activity of 210Pb. The common form of the CRS (constant rate of 210Pb supply) model as derived by Appleby and Oldfield (1978) solves for age based on the distribution of 210Pb in the sediment record. Prior to application of the age model, 210Pb profiles were evaluated to ensure they were sufficiently resolved to apply the CRS model without bias towards ages that are too old or accretion rates that are too low at depth (Binford, 1990). All gamma analyses were ongoing from 2015 and completed in 2016.
Appleby, P.G., and Oldfield, F., 1978, The calculation of lead-210 dates assuming a constant rate of supply of unsupported 210Pb to the sediment: Catena, v. 5, issue 1, p. 1–8,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0341-8162(78)80002-2.
Binford, M.W., 1990, Calculation and uncertainty analysis of 210 Pb dates for PIRLA project lake sediment cores: Journal of Paleolimnology, v. 3, issue 3, p. 253-267,
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00219461.
Cutshall, N.H., Larsen, I.L., and Olsen, C.R., 1983, Direct analysis of 210 Pb in sediment samples—Self-absorption corrections: Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, v. 206, issues 1–2, p. 309–312,
https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-5087(83)91273-5.
Goldberg, E.D, 1963, Geochronology with 210 Pb, in Miller, J.A., convener, Radioactive dating: International Atomic Energy Agency Symposium on Radioactive Dating, Athens, Greece, November 19-23, 1962, [Proceedings], p. 121-131.