| Compliant dynamic displacement analysis versus traditional rigid block (Newmark) analysis | |
![]() |
Traditional (Newmark-type) analysis of soil displacement assumes a rigid mass shearing at its base in response to 1-D dipslope earthquake motion. Kramer & Smith (1997) extended the 1-D Newmark approach by making the mass compliant. Our model incorporates compliance and multidirectional components of earthquake motion, and block resonant motions. |
| Why does compliance matter in dynamic displacement analysis?
|
geotech/spectraposter/compliance.html
contact: Robert Kayen
last modified 2019