Jin-Si R. Over Christopher R. Sherwood Eric D. Marsjanik Jonathan S. Borden Marinna A. Martini Athina M.Z. Lange 20260205 1.0 JPEGs and tabular digital data data release DOI:10.5066/P95C0DGM Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center, Woods Hole, MA U.S. Geological Survey, Coastal and Marine Hazards and Resources Program https://doi.org/10.5066/P95C0DGM https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/60d61173d34e960393675c90 Jin-Si R. Over Christopher R. Sherwood Eric. D. Marsjanik Jonathan S. Borden Marinna A. Martini Athina M.Z. Lange 2026 1.0 data release doi:10.5066/P95C0DGM Reston, VA U.S. Geological Survey Suggested citation: Over, J.R., Sherwood, C.R., Marsjanik, E.D., Borden, J.S., Martini, M.A., and Lange, A.M.Z., 2026, USGS CoastCam CACO-01 at Head of the Meadow Beach, Cape Cod National Seashore, Massachusetts (2019 to 2024)—Imagery and Calibration Data: U.S. Geological Survey data release, https://doi.org/10.5066/P95C0DGM. https://doi.org/10.5066/P95C0DGM https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/60d5fd5bd34e960393670e8a Two digital video cameras (CACO-01 c1 and c2) were installed at Head of the Meadow Beach, Cape Cod National Seashore in Massachusetts as part of a U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) research project to study the beach and nearshore environment. The cameras were located near the top of the 18-meter-high bluff and faced north-east (c1) and east (c2) along the beach. They ran from December 2019 through March 2024, and when properly functioning, the cameras collected 10 minutes of raw video and produced snapshots and time-averaged image products every half hour. This data release includes the raw imagery products and the necessary intrinsic orientation (IO) and extrinsic orientation (EO) calibration data to utilize the imagery to make quantitative measurements from the imagery. USGS researchers analyzed the imagery collected from these cameras to remotely sense a range of information including shoreline position, sandbar migration, wave run-up on the beach, alongshore currents, and nearshore bathymetry. These cameras are part of the USGS CoastCam network, supported by the Total Water Level/Coastal Change Project in the USGS Coastal and Marine Hazards and Resources Program, Natural Hazards Mission Area. Data were obtained to document interannual changes in shoreline position and coastal morphology. These imagery data, calibration files, and ground control point (GCP) locations are the extrinsic orientation (geolocation) data and intrinsic orientation (camera parameters) data to produce orthorectified image products that can be viewed in a geographic information system (GIS) or other software to identify topographic and shallow-water bathymetric features. The bounding coordinates below represent the approximate limits of the overlapping images from CoastCam CACO-01. Throughout the course of the deployment the cameras can move due to changes in temperature, wind, or other factors. To limit the effect of camera movements on data products, we recommend the user calculate their own EO data based on the dates of the imagery used. All calibration images are geotagged with the general location of the CACO-01 camera pole in geographic coordinates NAD83(2011) to keep the images in the imagery data system in one place even though the IO images were taken in Woods Hole, but their location information is irrelevant to their use. Images from c1 and c2 have their extrinsic locations in the Exif tag UserComment in NAD83(2011)/UTM 19N + NAVD88 m, which are used by the imaging toolbox to put the images into real world coordinates when georectified. GCP information and EO .yaml files are in NAD83(2011)/UTM 19N + NAVD88. For more information about the Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center Field Activities involved with calibration, see https://cmgds.marine.usgs.gov/services/activity.php?fan=2019-043-FA, https://cmgds.marine.usgs.gov/services/activity.php?fan=2020-015-FA, and https://cmgds.marine.usgs.gov/services/activity.php?fan=2022-009-FA. All images can be viewed or downloaded individually or in bulk on the USGS Imagery Data System here: https://cmgds.marine.usgs.gov/idsviewer/data_release/10.5066-P95C0DGM in the collection CACO01_IO and CACO01_EO. 20191212 20200304 20220126 ground condition, dates refer to the days the camera was calibrated intrinsically or extrinsically. Complete As needed -70.0812320 -70.0733245 42.0564112 42.0504522 None U.S. Geological Survey USGS Coastal and Marine Hazards and Resources Program CMHRP Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center WHCMSC CoastCam Total Water Level camera calibration USGS Thesaurus image analysis field methods video monitoring optical methods ecosystem monitoring photography remote sensing image collections geomorphology GPS measurement ocean sciences coastal processes ISO 19115 Topic Category geoscientificInformation elevation oceans USGS Metadata Identifier USGS:60d61173d34e960393675c90 Common geographic areas United States Massachusetts North Truro Cape Cod Cape Cod National Seashore Geographic Names Information System (GNIS) Head of the Meadow Beach No access constraints. Please see 'Distribution Information' for details. These data are marked with a Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal License. These data are in the public domain and do not have any use constraints. Users are advised to read the dataset's metadata thoroughly to understand appropriate use and data limitations. Please recognize the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) as the source of this information. These data are not intended for navigational use. Jin-Si R. Over U.S. Geological Survey, Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center Geographer mailing and physical address

384 Woods Hole Rd.

Woods Hole MA 02543-1598 508-548-8700 x2297 jover@usgs.gov https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/file/get/60d5fd5bd34e960393670e8a?name=CACO01_CoastCam_browse.png&allowOpen=true Location map and field of view of CoastCam CACO01. PNG https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/file/get/60d61173d34e960393675c90?name=CACO01_calibration_browse.png&allowOpen=true Example calibration products (extrinsic and intrinsic) from camera 1 and 2 and an image of CACO-01 in place on the bluff. PNG MathWorks MATLAB R2024a (https://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab.html), Python 3.13.1, PyExifTool Python library (https://pypi.org/project/PyExifTool/) version 0.5.6; ExifTool (https://exiftool.org/) version 12.76, HOTM (https://github.com/Coastal-Imaging-Research-Network/hotm2) Brittany L. Bruder Katherine L. Brodie 20200909 publication SoftwareX Volume 12, 100582 online Elsevier This publication describes the steps used to calibrate the CoastCam. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2020.100582 Extrinsic orientation (EO)calibration is assessed using GCPs visible in the camera FOV. The GCPs location was determined with Real-Time Kinematic (RTK) Global Positioning System (GPS) equipment. Accuracy of the extrinsic calibration was also tied to the human ability to locate targets in the imagery when using the Coastal Imaging Research Network (CIRN) Quantitative Coastal Imaging Toolbox (Bruder and Brodie, 2020). Calibration success can be examined using the CIRN toolbox where parameters azimuth, tilt, and roll have errors less than 2 degrees. The camera systems were liable to move over time via wind, wear, and human interactions cleaning the camera, all of which may change the camera calibration parameters. Calibration data is stored as YAML Ain't Markup Language (YAML)files, which can be opened with any text viewer, and are named with the calibration date. The camera system installed (two FLIR Blackfly 5MP GigE PGE-50S5C-C color cameras) had an extrinsic (EO) and intrinsic (IO) calibration process. The IO calibration process was completed on 20191212 for CACO-01 c1 and c2 and is provided as a set of JPEG images with a checkerboard pattern in different parts of the image. These are used with the Camera Calibration Application (https://www.mathworks.com/help/vision/ref/cameracalibrator-app.html) to solve for the intrinsic parameters and lens distortion, which are provided in a YAML file of resultant IO parameters. Significant figures are taken as provided by the app. A 28mm square checkerboard pattern (7 x 9 squares) was used and the lens distortion was solved for 3 radial coefficients and 2 tangential coefficients. These are used in the CIRN toolbox steps A through C to be able to georectify imagery and make quantifiable measurements. The intrinsic parameters “coU” and “coV” are used by CIRN, but the same parameters are inconsistently named (example, cOU/cOV, Cx/Cy, u0/v0) within the broader camera community and may cause issues in running code. The EO calibration process was completed twice, on 20200304 and 20220126. This dataset consists of YAML files of resultant EO parameters from the CIRN Quantitative Coastal Imaging Toolbox steps B and C (Bruder and Brodie, 2020), a comma-separated values (CSV) file of GCP locations and description, and two sets of images from CACO-01 labeled as 'raw' and 'annotated' showing the GCP targets that were surveyed. Significant figures in the YAML files are as provided by the Camera Calibration Application. All IO calibration images are provided, but not all may be necessary in the CIRN Toolbox. Surveyed GCP locations and images are provided for the two EO calibration surveys. Horizontal coordinates of the GCPs were referenced to the North American Datum of 1983 (National Spatial Reference System 2011) Universal Transverse Mercator Zone 19 North (NAD83(2011)/UTM Zone 19N) coordinate system (Epoch 2010.00) as to be ingested in the CIRN Toolbox, which encourages a geographic coordinate system. The camera pole (not the individual cameras) was located with the RTK equipment at 42.05049347 N, -70.07738362 W EPSG:6318 NAD83 (2011), this location and coordinate system is easily input into the EXIF headers and is read by the Imagery Data System to keep all images related to CACO-01 in the same location. RTK points have a 2 cm horizontal accuracy. After running the CIRN Toolbox with the two EO surveys the difference between the horizontal (xy) location of c1 was 15 cm and c2 was 5 cm. RTK points have a 1 cm vertical accuracy. After running the CIRN Toolbox with the two EO surveys the difference in vertical (z) location of c1 was 1 cm and c2 was 2 cm. Before installation at Head of the Meadow CACO-01 c1 and c2 were used to take a series of photos for the IO calibration. This process consisted of collecting 86 and 100 JPEG images for c1 and c2, respectively (see CACO01_CalibrationImageList.csv and the CACO01_IO collection on the IDS). These images contain a 28 mm square checkerboard moved throughout the image frame. This checkerboard pattern allows lens distortion metrics to be calculated. The image file name is formatted as CACO01_c#_IO_YYYYMMDD_######.jpg where c# is the camera number, YYYYMMDD is the date the IO images were obtained, and ###### is the original number written to the file. Note that the time and location of where the actual photos were taken is irrelevant, they have been tagged with the GPS location of the camera pole for which they are relevant and given a GPSTimeStamp of 12:00:00. Step processed by Jonathan Borden. 20191212 Eric D. Marsjanik U.S. Geological Survey, Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center Electronics Technician mailing and physical address

U.S. Geological Survey – Marine Operations Facility

11 Woods Hole Rd.

Falmouth MA 02540 508-548-8700 x2216 emarsjanik@usgs.gov To place the photos taken by the CoastCam into real world coordinates and to rectify them into a planar view, objects within the FOV of the camera must be located. To do so, the elevation and position of the camera lenses c1 and c2 in the CoastCam setup were measured with the RTK GPS and then multiple stationary targets, between 5 and 10 per camera as recommended by Brodie and Bruder (2020), were spread through the camera FOV to be used as GCPs, and the location of each was measured with the RTK GPS equipment as follows. 1. A base station was set up in the parking lot at Head of the Meadow Beach on an established benchmark. 2. A GPS receiver was connected to the base station to collect RTK data in NAD83(2011)/ UTM Zone 19N + NAVD88 using GEOID 12B* on March 4, 2020 and in NAD83(2011)/ UTM Zone 19N + NAVD88 using GEOID 18 on January 26, 2022. 3. Five plywood checkerboard targets were placed on the beach propped up facing towards CoastCam CACO-01. These were measured with the rovers at the intersection of the sand and the middle of the target. Once all GCPs were placed, a snapshot (snap) was taken with the camera. The targets were moved to multiple locations to take additional snap images. On 20200304, four snap images were taken with c1 (CACO01_c1_20200304_GCP_image_raw_1583337600.jpg, CACO01_c1_20200304_GCP_image_raw_1583341200.jpg, CACO01_c1_20200304_GCP_image_raw_1583344800.jpg, and CACO01_c1_20200304_GCP_image_raw_1583346600.jpg) for a total of 10 unique GCP targets. All of the GCPs can be viewed on CACO01_c1_20200304_GCP_image_combined_raw.jpg where targets were cropped and superimposed onto the image, they are annotated in CACO01_c1_20200304_GCP_image_annotated.jpg to match the GCP# in CACO01_c1_20200304_EO_GCPsurvey.csv. The image coordinates of the targets on the combined image are the same as in the original images. On 20200304, three snap images were taken with c2 (CACO01_c2_20200304_GCP_image_raw_1583337600.jpg, CACO01_c2_20200304_GCP_image_raw_1583341200.jpg, and CACO01_c1_20200304_GCP_image_raw_1583344800.jpg) for a total of 6 unique GCP targets. Note there are four targets in *raw_1583341200 but only the target in the foreground was surveyed with the RTK. All of the GCPs can be viewed on CACO01_c2_20200304_GCP_image_combined_raw.jpg where useable targets were cropped and superimposed onto the image, they are annotated in CACO01_c2_20200304_GCP_image_annotated.jpg to match the GCP# in CACO01_c2_20200304_EO_GCPsurvey.csv. The image coordinates of the targets on the combined image are the same as in the original images. On 20220126, one snap image was taken with c1 (CACO01_c1_20220126_GCP_image_raw.jpg) for a total of 5 unique GCP targets. The targets are annotated in CACO01_c1_20220126_GCP_image_annotated.jpg to match the GCP# in CACO01_c1_20220126_EO_GCPsurvey.csv. On 20220126, one snap image was taken with c2 (CACO01_c2_20220126_GCP_image_raw.jpg) for a total of 5 unique GCP targets. The targets are annotated in CACO01_c2_20220126_GCP_image_annotated.jpg to match the GCP# in CACO01_c2_20220126_EO_GCPsurvey.csv. The image file name is formatted as CACO01_c#_YYYYMMDD_GCP_type_######.jpg where c# is the camera number, YYYYMMDD is the date the EO images were obtained, type is raw, combined or annotated, and ###### is the original number written to the file. *The elevation values using GEOID 12B were transformed to GEOID 18 values using vdatum (https://vdatum.noaa.gov/vdatumweb/) on 2025-02-01 and no changes in the values occurred, so for consistency all data is provided in GEOID 18. 20220126 Jin-Si R. Over U.S. Geological Survey, Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center Geographer mailing and physical address

U.S. Geological Survey

384 Woods Hole Rd.

Woods Hole MA 02543-1598 508-548-8700 x2297 jover@usgs.gov The IO images together with the GCP targets from the EO surveys were used in the CIRN Toolbox and with the Camera Calibration App (MATLAB) to solve for the 3 radial coefficients and 2 tangential coefficients that make up the intrinsic parameters and lens distortion and the EO parameters. The IO coefficient values are provided in YAML files for each camera (CACO01_c1_20191212_IO.yaml and CACO01_c2_20191212_IO.yaml) and the EO parameters are provided in YAML files for each camera (CACO01_c1_20200304_EO.yaml, CACO01_c2_20200304_EO.yaml, CACO01_c1_20220126_EO.yaml, and CACO01_c2_20220126_EO.yaml). Files are provided in zip folder by date and combine camera c1 and c2 files; CACO01_IO_20191212.zip, CACO01_EO_20200304.zip, and CACO01_EO_20220126.zip. These YAML files can be re-solved for using the raw images and survey data provided in the CIRN Toolbox. Please refer to Brodie and Bruder (2020) for information about the methods. Step processed by Athina Lange. 20250210 Chris Sherwood U.S. Geological Survey, Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center mailing and physical

384 Woods Hole Rd.

Woods Hole MA 02543-1598 USA 508-548-8700 csherwood@usgs.gov All images were geotagged and processed to add additional information required by the USGS to the exchangeable image file format (EXIF) and other imagery headers using PyExifTool Python library (https://pypi.org/project/PyExifTool/, version: 0.5.6). A list of all the useable images is provided in CACO01_ImageList.csv. The following describes an example of the Python dictionary object with each entry in the dictionary being a tag-value pair written to each image in the data release: tags = { 'Copyright': 'Public Domain', 'CopyrightNotice': 'Public Domain - please credit U.S. Geological Survey', 'Artist': 'USGS WHCMSC', 'Make': 'FLIR', 'Model': 'Blackfly 50S5C-C', 'GPSLatitude': '42.05049347, 'GPSLongitude': '-70.07738362', 'GPSMapDatum': 'EPSG:6318 NAD83 (2011)', 'GPSAreaInformation': 'camera pole location surveyed with RTK-GNSS', 'GPSLatitudeRef': 'N', 'GPSLongitudeRef': 'W', 'Credit': 'U.S. Geological Survey', 'Contact': 'whsc_data_contact@usgs.gov', 'UsageTerms': 'Unless otherwise stated, all data, metadata and related materials are considered to satisfy the quality standards relative to the purpose for which the data were collected. Although these data and associated metadata have been reviewed for accuracy and completeness and approved for release by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), no warranty expressed or implied is made regarding the display or utility of the data for other purposes, nor on all computer systems, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty', 'AttributionURL': 'https://doi.org/10.5066/P95C0DGM', 'Author': 'Jin-Si R. Over, Christopher R. Sherwood, Eric D. Marsjanik, Jonathan S. Borden, Athina M.Z. Lange', 'XMP-photoshop:Credit': 'U.S. Geological Survey', 'iptcCore:CreatorWorkEmail': 'whsc_data_contact@usgs.gov','Rights': 'Public Domain', 'ExternalMetadataLink': 'https://www1.usgs.gov/pir/api/identifiers/USGS:60d61173d34e960393675c90'}. The UserComment EXIF metadata field was used to store the camera intrinsics and extrinsics in the image metadata. The calibration date refers to the date the nearest EO was done (not relevant). The UserComment has a nested dictionary structure. The highest-level dictionary contains two nested dictionaries as well as a note explaining the structure of the UserComment field. One nested dictionary contains the relevant intrinsic (NU, NV, coU, coV, fx, fy, d1, d2, d3, t1, t2) and extrinsic (x, y, z, azimuth, tilt, roll) data variables. The extrinsic variables include both horizontal and vertical position of the camera in UTM coordinates. The other nested dictionary contains text descriptions for each of the variables in the dictionary of data variables. The GPSLatitude and GPSLongitude are specified as the CACO-01 camera pole position and allows the user to find all relevant imagery for CACO-02 on the Imagery Data Service. Additionally, tags were added to the Python dictionary object that have different values for either an IO or EO calibration image, the FA relevant to the extrinsics, and camera (c#) c1 or c2. These tags are included as follows: IO image: 'Description':'https://cmgds.marine.usgs.gov/services/activity.php?fan=2019-043-FA; This image was captured from a stationary camera (CACO-01 [c#]) to perform an intrinsic calibration.' 'Keywords': "Head of the Meadow Beach, Cape Cod National Seashore, Massachusetts, CoastCam, USGS, intrinsic calibration, remote sensing" EO image: 'Description':'https://cmgds.marine.usgs.gov/services/activity.php?fan=[INSERT FA]; This image was captured from a stationary camera (CACO-01 [c#]) at Cape Cod National Seashore, Massachusetts with extrinsic calibration targets in the field of view.' 'Keywords': "Head of the Meadow Beach, Cape Cod National Seashore, Massachusetts, CoastCam, USGS, extrinsic calibration, remote sensing, ground control point" To read out the imagery header information to a CSV file the command is: 'exiftool -csv *.jpg > allheaders.csv'. Specific tags may be specified with this command, if preferred. Or use the online tool https://exif.tools/ (accessed May 9, 2025) 20250509 The calibration images were uploaded to the IDS into the collections CACO01_EO and CACO01_IO. These can be accessed at https://cmgds.marine.usgs.gov/idsviewer/data_release/10.5066-P95C0DGM. 20250509 Jin-Si R. Over U.S. Geological Survey, Woods Hole Coastal and Marine Science Center Geographer mailing and physical address

U.S. Geological Survey

384 Woods Hole Rd.

Woods Hole MA 02543-1598 508-548-8700 x2297 jover@usgs.gov Universal Transverse Mercator 19 0.999600 -69.000000 0.000000 500000.000000 0.000000 row and column 0.001 0.001 meters North American Datum of 1983 (National Spatial Reference System 2011) GRS_1980 6378137.0 298.257222101 North American Vertical Datum of 1988 0.001 meters Explicit elevation coordinate included with horizontal coordinates CACO01_CalibrationImageList.csv The CSV file contains the complete list of EO and IO images uploaded onto the IDS and the date they were collected. producer defined ImageName File names of individual images, see the Process Description for file naming convention. USGS Character string. Date Calendar date of collection in MM/dd/YYYY USGS 12/12/2019 01/26/2022 CACO01_c1_20191212_IO.yaml The solved IO values for camera 1 from step A in the Camera Calibration procedures outlined in Bruder and Brodie (2020). The lines 1-11 are the values and lines 12-22 are the definitions. There are no actual attribute domain ranges as it is a one-to-one attribute to value ratio. USGS NU number of pixel columns Bruder and Brodie (2020) 2448 2448 pixels NV number of pixel rows Bruder and Brodie (2020) 2048 2048 pixels coU U component of principal point Bruder and Brodie (2020) 1174.62686482029 1174.62686482029 pixels coV V component of principal point Bruder and Brodie (2020) 1159.61891138849 1159.61891138849 pixels fx x component of focal length Bruder and Brodie (2020) 3568.82795358422 3568.82795358422 pixels fy y component of focal length Bruder and Brodie (2020) 3561.23016607696 3561.23016607696 pixels d1 First radial distortion coefficient Bruder and Brodie (2020) -0.223894413628877 -0.223894413628877 pixels d2 Second radial distortion coefficient Bruder and Brodie (2020) 0.179575895946410 0.179575895946410 pixels d3 Third radial distortion coefficient Bruder and Brodie (2020) -0.142603915321976 -0.142603915321976 pixels t1 First tangential distortion coefficient Bruder and Brodie (2020) 0.000103375577572249 0.000103375577572249 pixels t2 Second tangential distortion coefficient Bruder and Brodie (2020) -0.000662288636500013 -0.000662288636500013 pixels CACO01_c2_20191212_IO.yaml The solved IO for camera 2 from step A in the Camera Calibration procedures outlined in Bruder and Brodie (2020). The lines 1-11 are the values and lines 12-22 are the definitions. There are no actual attribute domain ranges as it is a one-to-one attribute to value ratio. USGS NU number of pixel columns Bruder and Brodie (2020) 2448 2448 pixels NV number of pixel rows Bruder and Brodie (2020) 2048 2048 pixels coU U component of principal point Bruder and Brodie (2020) 1207.60313102422 1207.60313102422 pixels coV V component of principal point Bruder and Brodie (2020) 1062.65152566984 1062.65152566984 pixels fx x component of focal length Bruder and Brodie (2020) 2389.98343454418 2389.98343454418 pixels fy y component of focal length Bruder and Brodie (2020) 2390.49258999349 2390.49258999349 pixels d1 First radial distortion coefficient Bruder and Brodie (2020) -0.215320891162456 -0.215320891162456 pixels d2 Second radial distortion coefficient Bruder and Brodie (2020) 0.160828621258090 0.160828621258090 pixels d3 Third radial distortion coefficient Bruder and Brodie (2020) -0.0396046946239307 -0.0396046946239307 pixels t1 First tangential distortion coefficient Bruder and Brodie (2020) -0.000704074888016825 -0.000704074888016825 pixels t2 Second tangential distortion coefficient Bruder and Brodie (2020) -0.00248988265653642 -0.00248988265653642 pixels CACO01_c1_20200304_EO_GCPsurvey.csv CSV file containing the location (x,y,z) of the GCPs (black and white targets) in the CoastCam camera 1 FOV and their location in the image (U,V). USGS GCP Number identifier of each GCP that can be found in CACO01_c1_20200304_GCP_image_annotated.jpg so that targets can be labeled correctly in Step B of Camera Calibration steps in Bruder and Brodie (2020). U.S. Geological Survey 1 10 none U Column location of the GCP coordinate in the raw image (CACO01_c1_20200304_GCP_image_raw.jpg). U.S. Geological Survey 336.5002008 1983.497485 pixels V Row location of the GCP coordinate in the raw image (CACO01_c1_20200304_GCP_image_raw.jpg). U.S. Geological Survey 655.0353086 1368.072346 pixels Easting 19N RTK X-coordinates in NAD83(2011)/UTM Zone 19N. U.S. Geological Survey 410761.414 410835.083 meters Northings 19N RTK Y-coordinates in NAD83(2011)/UTM Zone 19N. U.S. Geological Survey 4656006.088 4656168.872 meters Elevation NAVD88 RTK Z-coordinates relative to NAVD88 using GEOID 18. A positive Z value is the up direction. U.S. Geological Survey -0.306 6.475 meters Description Location of each GCP placed within the camera's FOV to solve for EO. U.S. Geological Survey Details about the GCP locations within the camera's FOV. CACO01_c2_20200304_EO_GCPsurvey.csv CSV file containing the location (x,y,z) of the GCPs (black and white targets) in CoastCam camera 2 FOV and their location in the image (U,V). USGS GCP Number identifier of each GCP that can be found in CACO01_c2_20200304_GCP_image_annotated.jpg so that targets can be labeled correctly in Step B of Camera Calibration steps in Bruder and Brodie (2020). U.S. Geological Survey 1 6 none U Column location of the GCP coordinate in the raw image (CACO01_c2_20200304_GCP_image_raw.jpg). U.S. Geological Survey 268.2945606 1745.257533 pixels V Row location of the GCP coordinate in the raw image (CACO01_c2_20200304_GCP_image_raw.jpg). U.S. Geological Survey 463.6674074 1019.741481 pixels Easting 19N RTK X-coordinates in NAD83(2011)/UTM Zone 19N. U.S. Geological Survey 410853.230 410952.143 meters Northings 19N RTK Y-coordinates in NAD83(2011)/UTM Zone 19N. U.S. Geological Survey 4655996.049 4656126.735 meters Elevation NAVD88 RTK Z-coordinates relative to NAVD88 using GEOID 18. A positive Z value is the up direction. U.S. Geological Survey 0.170 5.435 meters Description Location of each GCP placed within the camera's FOV to solve for EO. U.S. Geological Survey Details about the GCP locations within the camera's FOV. CACO01_c1_20220126_EO_GCPsurvey.csv CSV file containing the location (x,y,z) of the GCPs (black and white targets) in the CoastCam camera 1 FOV and their location in the image (U,V). USGS GCP Number identifier of each GCP that can be found in CACO01_c1_20220126_GCP_image_annotated.jpg so that targets can be labeled correctly in Step B of Camera Calibration steps in Bruder and Brodie (2020). U.S. Geological Survey 1 5 none U Column location of the GCP coordinate in the raw image (CACO01_c1_20200304_GCP_image_raw.jpg). U.S. Geological Survey 1154.451678 2171.695962 pixels V Row location of the GCP coordinate in the raw image (CACO01_c1_20200304_GCP_image_raw.jpg). U.S. Geological Survey 734.885185 1149.71284 pixels Easting 19N RTK X-coordinates in NAD83(2011)/UTM Zone 19N. U.S. Geological Survey 410815.173 410845.697 meters Northings 19N RTK Y-coordinates in NAD83(2011)/UTM Zone 19N. U.S. Geological Survey 4656025.088 4656123.369 meters Elevation NAVD88 RTK Z-coordinates relative to NAVD88 using GEOID 18. A positive Z value is the up direction. U.S. Geological Survey 2.086 5.916 meters Description Location of each GCP placed within the camera's FOV to solve for EO. U.S. Geological Survey Details about the GCP locations within the camera's FOV. CACO01_c2_20220126_EO_GCPsurvey.csv CSV file containing the location (x,y,z) of the GCPs (black and white targets) in CoastCam camera 2 FOV and their location in the image (U,V). USGS GCP Number identifier of each GCP that can be found in CACO01_c2_20220126_GCP_image_annotated.jpg so that targets can be labeled correctly in Step B of Camera Calibration steps in Bruder and Brodie (2020). U.S. Geological Survey 1 5 none U Column location of the GCP coordinate in the raw image (CACO01_c2_20200304_GCP_image_raw.jpg). U.S. Geological Survey 347.3027426 1590.410783 pixels V Row location of the GCP coordinate in the raw image (CACO01_c2_20200304_GCP_image_raw.jpg). U.S. Geological Survey 512.464444 780.636296 pixels Easting 19N RTK X-coordinates in NAD83(2011)/UTM Zone 19N. U.S. Geological Survey 410854.097 410923.325 meters Northings 19N RTK Y-coordinates in NAD83(2011)/UTM Zone 19N. U.S. Geological Survey 4656008.390 4656080.190 meters Elevation NAVD88 RTK Z-coordinates relative to NAVD88 using GEOID 18. A positive Z value is the up direction. U.S. Geological Survey 2.277 5.625 meters Description Location of each GCP placed within the camera's FOV to solve for EO. U.S. Geological Survey Details about the GCP locations within the camera's FOV. CACO01_c1_20200304_EO.yaml YAML file containing the solved extrinsic orientation (EO) from Step C in the Camera Calibration procedures outlined in Bruder and Brodie (2020) for camera 1 using values from 2020-03-04. Rows 1-6 are values and rows 7-12 are definitions. Ranges provided are +/- error estimates produced by Step C. USGS x Camera X-coordinate, Easting in NAD83(2011)/UTM Zone 19N of camera position. Value in YAML is 410843.703. U.S. Geological Survey 410843.664 410843.742 meters y camera Y-coordinate, Northing in NAD83(2011)/UTM Zone 19N of camera position. Value in YAML is 4655943.259 U.S. Geological Survey 4655943.180 4655943.338 meters z camera Z-coordinate, elevation referenced to NAVD88. Value in YAML is 26.961. U.S. Geological Survey 26.897 27.025 meters azimuth The horizontal direction the camera is pointing and positive clockwise (CW) from World Y Axis. Value in YAML is 344.869. Bruder and Brodie (2020) 344.852 344.887 Angle units in degrees tilt The up/down tilt of the camera. 0 is the camera looking nadir, 90 is the camera looking at the horizon right side up, and 180 is looking directly up. Value in YAML is 75.377 Bruder and Brodie (2020) 75.357 75.396 Angle units in degrees roll The rotation around a horizontal axis going through the length of the lens of the camera. 0 degrees is a horizontal flat camera. Looking from behind the camera, counterclockwise (CCW) rotation of the camera would result in a positive roll. Value in YAML is 0.622. Bruder and Brodie (2020) 0.579 0.664 Angle units in degrees CACO01_c2_20200304_EO.yaml YAML file containing the solved extrinsic orientation (EO) from Step C in the Camera Calibration procedures outlined in Bruder and Brodie (2020) for camera 2 using values from 2020-03-04. Rows 1-6 are values and rows 7-12 are definitions. Ranges provided are +/- error estimates produced by Step C. USGS x Camera X-coordinate, Easting in NAD83(2011)/UTM Zone 19N of camera position. Value in YAML is 410844.368. U.S. Geological Survey 410844.304 410844.432 meters y camera Y-coordinate, Northing in NAD83(2011)/UTM Zone 19N of camera position. Value in YAML is 4655943.091 U.S. Geological Survey 4655942.989 4655943.192 meters z camera Z-coordinate, elevation referenced to NAVD88. Value in YAML is 27.008. U.S. Geological Survey 26.902 27.114 meters azimuth The horizontal direction the camera is pointing and positive clockwise (CW) from World Y Axis. Value in YAML is 28.528. Bruder and Brodie (2020) 28.486 28.569 Angle units in degrees tilt The up/down tilt of the camera. 0 is the camera looking nadir, 90 is the camera looking at the horizon right side up, and 180 is looking directly up. Value in YAML is 67.505 Bruder and Brodie (2020) 67.461 67.549 Angle units in degrees roll The rotation around a horizontal axis going through the length of the lens of the camera. 0 degrees is a horizontal flat camera. Looking from behind the camera, counterclockwise (CCW) rotation of the camera would result in a positive roll. Value in YAML is 1.593. Bruder and Brodie (2020) 1.517 1.668 Angle units in degrees CACO01_c1_20220126_EO.yaml YAML file containing the solved extrinsic orientation (EO) from Step C in the Camera Calibration procedures outlined in Bruder and Brodie (2020) for camera 1 using values from 2022-01-26. Rows 1-6 are values and rows 7-12 are definitions. Ranges provided are +/- error estimates produced by Step C. USGS x Camera X-coordinate, Easting in NAD83(2011)/UTM Zone 19N of camera position. Value in YAML is 410843.846. U.S. Geological Survey 410843.815 410843.876 meters y camera Y-coordinate, Northing in NAD83(2011)/UTM Zone 19N of camera position. Value in YAML is 4655943.358 U.S. Geological Survey 4655943.307 4655943.410 meters z camera Z-coordinate, elevation referenced to NAVD88. Value in YAML is 26.968. U.S. Geological Survey 26.929 27.007 meters azimuth The horizontal direction the camera is pointing and positive clockwise (CW) from World Y Axis. Value in YAML is 344.668. Bruder and Brodie (2020) 344.654 344.682 Angle units in degrees tilt The up/down tilt of the camera. 0 is the camera looking nadir, 90 is the camera looking at the horizon right side up, and 180 is looking directly up. Value in YAML is 75.122 Bruder and Brodie (2020) 75.106 75.128 Angle units in degrees roll The rotation around a horizontal axis going through the length of the lens of the camera. 0 degrees is a horizontal flat camera. Looking from behind the camera, counterclockwise (CCW) rotation of the camera would result in a positive roll. Value in YAML is -0.011. Bruder and Brodie (2020) -0.046 0.023 Angle units in degrees CACO01_c2_20220126_EO.yaml YAML file containing the solved extrinsic orientation (EO) from Step C in the Camera Calibration procedures outlined in Bruder and Brodie (2020) for camera 2 using values from 2022-01-26. Rows 1-6 are values and rows 7-12 are definitions. Ranges provided are +/- error estimates produced by Step C. USGS x Camera X-coordinate, Easting in NAD83(2011)/UTM Zone 19N of camera position. Value in YAML is 410844.317. U.S. Geological Survey 410844.259 410844.376 meters y camera Y-coordinate, Northing in NAD83(2011)/UTM Zone 19N of camera position. Value in YAML is 4655943.137 U.S. Geological Survey 4655943.090 4655943.184 meters z camera Z-coordinate, elevation referenced to NAVD88. Value in YAML is 27.027 U.S. Geological Survey 26.965 27.089 meters azimuth The horizontal direction the camera is pointing and positive clockwise (CW) from World Y Axis. Value in YAML is 28.450 Bruder and Brodie (2020) 28.412 28.487 Angle units in degrees tilt The up/down tilt of the camera. 0 is the camera looking nadir, 90 is the camera looking at the horizon right side up, and 180 is looking directly up. Value in YAML is 67.014 Bruder and Brodie (2020) 66.981 67.048 Angle units in degrees roll The rotation around a horizontal axis going through the length of the lens of the camera. 0 degrees is a horizontal flat camera. Looking from behind the camera, counterclockwise (CCW) rotation of the camera would result in a positive roll. Value in YAML is 1.474 Bruder and Brodie (2020) 1.434 1.515 Angle units in degrees File names are broken down as follows: ”CoastCamID_c#_YYYYMMDD_calibration.***” where the Head of the Meadow CoastCam is CACO01, c# is either c1 or c2, and YYYYMMDD refers to the date of the calibration. For more information on the IO and EO parameters see Bruder and Brodie (2020). USGS U.S. Geological Survey - ScienceBase mailing and physical

Denver Federal Center, Building 810, Mail Stop 302

Denver CO 80225 1-888-275-8747 sciencebase@usgs.gov CoastCam calibration and rectification data for CACO-01. This publication was prepared by an agency of the United States Government. Unless otherwise stated, all data, metadata and related materials are considered to satisfy the quality standards relative to the purpose for which the data were collected. Although these data and associated metadata have been reviewed for accuracy and completeness and approved for release by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), no warranty expressed or implied is made regarding the display or utility of the data for other purposes, nor on all computer systems, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. The USGS or the U.S. Government shall not be held liable for improper or incorrect use of the data described and/or contained herein. YAML 1.0.0 The intrinsic and extrinsic calibration data. 0.1 https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/60d61173d34e960393675c90 https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/file/get/60d61173d34e960393675c90 https://doi.org/10.5066/P95C0DGM The first link in the list above is to the child page where files can be downloaded individually, the second link is to directly download all the data on the page, the third is to the doi to the main publication. Transfer size is in MB. CSV Exported from Excel Office 365 16.01 List of calibration images and the date and time of collection (CACO01_CalibrationImageList.csv) and ground control locations (CACO01_c1_20200304_EO_GCPsurvey.csv, CACO01_c2_20200304_EO_GCPsurvey.csv, CACO01_c2_20220126_EO_GCPsurvey.csv, and CACO01_c1_20220126_EO_GCPsurvey.csv). 0.01 https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/60d61173d34e960393675c90 https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/file/get/60d61173d34e960393675c90 https://doi.org/10.5066/P95C0DGM The first link in the list above is to the child page where files can be downloaded individually, the second link is to directly download all the data on the page, the third is to the doi to the main publication. Transfer size is in MB. JPEG 1.0.0 The image products. 167 https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/item/60d61173d34e960393675c90 https://www.sciencebase.gov/catalog/file/get/60d61173d34e960393675c90 https://cmgds.marine.usgs.gov/idsviewer/data_release/10.5066-P95C0DGM https://doi.org/10.5066/P138GAKI https://doi.org/10.5066/P95C0DGM The first link in the list above is to the child page where files can be downloaded individually, the second link is to directly download all the data on the page, the third and fourth link is to the Imagery Data System where the photos can be searched, viewed and downloaded individually (filter by image type or Date Time Original), and the fifth link is to the doi to the main publication. Transfer size refers to the total size of all images in MB if downloaded from the IDS, images are not hosted on sciencebase. None 20260205 Jin-Si R. Over U.S. Geological Survey, Northeast Region Geographer mailing and physical

U.S. Geological Survey

384 Woods Hole Rd.

Woods Hole MA 02543-1598 508-548-8700 x2297 whsc_data_contact@usgs.gov The metadata contact email address is a generic address in the event the person is no longer with USGS. Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata FGDC-STD-001-1998 universal time