Wave observations from bottom-mounted pressure sensors in Bellingham Bay, Washington from Dec 2017 to Jan 2018

Metadata also available as - [Outline] - [Parseable text] - [XML]

Frequently anticipated questions:


What does this data set describe?

Title:
Wave observations from bottom-mounted pressure sensors in Bellingham Bay, Washington from Dec 2017 to Jan 2018
Abstract:
RBRduo pressure and temperature sensors (early 2015 generation), mounted on aluminum frames, were moored in shallow (< 6 m) water depths in Bellingham Bay, Washington, to capture wave heights and periods. Continuous pressure fluctuations are transformed into surface-wave observations of wave heights, periods, and frequency spectra at 30-minute intervals.
Supplemental_Information:
Information about the data collection field activities can be found at: https://cmgds.marine.usgs.gov/fan_info.php?fan=2017-706-FA
Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
  1. How might this data set be cited?
    Crosby, Sean C., and Grossman, Eric E., 2019, Wave observations from bottom-mounted pressure sensors in Bellingham Bay, Washington from Dec 2017 to Jan 2018: data release DOI:10.5066/P9JZ5F00, U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center, Santa Cruz, California.

    Online Links:

    This is part of the following larger work.

    Crosby, Sean C., and Grossman, Eric E., 2019, Wave observations from nearshore bottom-mounted pressure sensors in Skagit and Bellingham Bays, Washington, USA from Dec 2017 to Feb 2018: data release DOI:10.5066/P9JZ5F00, U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center, Santa Cruz, CA.

    Online Links:

  2. What geographic area does the data set cover?
    West_Bounding_Coordinate: -122.550
    East_Bounding_Coordinate: -122.497
    North_Bounding_Coordinate: 48.761
    South_Bounding_Coordinate: 48.715
  3. What does it look like?
  4. Does the data set describe conditions during a particular time period?
    Beginning_Date: 27-Nov-2017
    Ending_Date: 24-Jan-2018
    Currentness_Reference:
    ground condition when data were collected
  5. What is the general form of this data set?
    Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: NetCDF files
  6. How does the data set represent geographic features?
    1. How are geographic features stored in the data set?
      This is a Point data set. It contains the following vector data types (SDTS terminology):
      • Point (6)
    2. What coordinate system is used to represent geographic features?
      Horizontal positions are specified in geographic coordinates, that is, latitude and longitude. Latitudes are given to the nearest 0.000001. Longitudes are given to the nearest 0.000001. Latitude and longitude values are specified in Decimal degrees. The horizontal datum used is D_WGS_1984.
      The ellipsoid used is WGS_1984.
      The semi-major axis of the ellipsoid used is 6378137.0.
      The flattening of the ellipsoid used is 1/298.257223563.
  7. How does the data set describe geographic features?
    Entity_and_Attribute_Overview:
    NetCDF files are self-contained and attribute information may be found in the header of the file itself.
    Entity_and_Attribute_Detail_Citation:
    The entity and attribute information was generated by the individual and/or agency identified as the originator of the data set. Please review the rest of the metadata record for additional details and information.

Who produced the data set?

  1. Who are the originators of the data set? (may include formal authors, digital compilers, and editors)
    • Sean C. Crosby
    • Eric E. Grossman
  2. Who also contributed to the data set?
  3. To whom should users address questions about the data?
    U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center
    Attn: PCMSC Science Data Coordinator
    2885 Mission Street
    Santa Cruz, CA

    831-427-4747 (voice)
    pcmsc_data@usgs.gov

Why was the data set created?

Wave observations were collected as part of the USGS Coastal Climate Impacts Project and development of the Puget Sound Coastal Storm Modeling System (PS-COSMOS) for Puget Sound and the Salish Sea. The wave data help support the validation of the PS-CoSMoS regional wave model for forecasting future extreme high-water levels and flood risk with projected sea-level rise and to characterize the present-day wave climate.

How was the data set created?

  1. From what previous works were the data drawn?
  2. How were the data generated, processed, and modified?
    Date: 24-Jan-2018 (process 1 of 4)
    Instrumented frames were deployed and recovered by hand on from a 17-foot sea Ark skiff on two occasions. During a 1.5-month deployment beginning December 11, 2017 and ending January 24, 2018, instruments were deployed at sites B1, B2, and B3. An earlier 1-week pilot study deployed instruments from November 27, 2017, through December 3, 2017, at sites B4, B5, and B6. Aluminum frames with a 1-m footprint were equipped with RBR's RBRduo pressure and temperature sensor (early 2015 generation). Mushroom and fluke anchors were attached to frames with chain. Twelve-inch surface floats were attached to anchors for recovery and were not expected to impact instrument recording. Pressure and temperature were recorded continuously. During the shorter 1-week pilot deployment (B4, B5, B6) instruments recorded at 6Hz, and during the 1.5-month longer deployment instruments recorded at 2Hz. Sensor height above bottom was estimated to be 20cm after some settling of the frame in sediment. During deployment and recovery, depth was sampled with a handheld sonar, and position was recorded with a handheld GPS. The instrument package and mooring system were light enough to deployed and recovered by hand. Person who carried out this activity:
    Sean C. Crosby
    Western Washington University
    Oceanographer
    516 High Street
    Bellingham, WA

    360-650-4697 (voice)
    sean.crosby@wwu.edu
    Date: 22-Feb-2019 (process 2 of 4)
    After recovery, the manufacturers' software, Ruskin v2.4, was used to download the data. Surface gravity wave properties were estimated from pressure fluctuations following methods developed by Jones and Monismith (2007). Wave properties are estimated under two assumptions, that linear wave theory is valid, and that current speeds are small compared to wave phase velocities. These assumptions may be violated in shallow water depths during large wave events, e.g. wave breaking, and during strong ebb or flood tides. Python 3.0 operating within Windows 10 was used to process the data and scripts are available in the public repository, https://github.com/dnowacki-usgs/stglib. Note that the instrument at S3 ran out battery power on Jan 23 2018, before recovery. Reference: Jones, N.L., and Monismith, S.G., 2007, Measuring short-period wind waves in a tidally forced environment with a subsurface pressure gauge: Limnology and Oceanography--Methods, v. 5, n. 10, p. 317–327, https://doi.org/10.4319/lom.2007.5.317 Person who carried out this activity:
    Sean C. Crosby
    Western Washington University
    Oceanographer
    516 High Street
    Bellingham, WA

    360-650-4697 (voice)
    sean.crosby@wwu.edu
    Date: 19-Oct-2020 (process 3 of 4)
    Edited metadata to add keywords section with USGS persistent identifier as theme keyword. No data were changed. Person who carried out this activity:
    U.S. Geological Survey
    Attn: VeeAnn A. Cross
    Marine Geologist
    384 Woods Hole Road
    Woods Hole, MA

    508-548-8700 x2251 (voice)
    508-457-2310 (FAX)
    vatnipp@usgs.gov
    Date: 13-Oct-2021 (process 4 of 4)
    Performed minor edits to the metadata to correct typos. No data were changed. Person who carried out this activity:
    U.S. Geological Survey
    Attn: Susan A. Cochran
    Geologist
    2885 Mission Street
    Santa Cruz, CA

    831-460-7545 (voice)
    scochran@usgs.gov
  3. What similar or related data should the user be aware of?

How reliable are the data; what problems remain in the data set?

  1. How well have the observations been checked?
    No formal attribute accuracy tests were conducted.
  2. How accurate are the geographic locations?
    The stated accuracy of the hand-held GPS unit used to determine instrument position ranged from 3-5 m.
  3. How accurate are the heights or depths?
    A formal accuracy assessment of the vertical positional information in the data set has either not been conducted, or is not applicable.
  4. Where are the gaps in the data? What is missing?
    Dataset is considered complete for the information presented, as described in the abstract. Users are advised to read the metadata for each part of this data release carefully for additional details.
  5. How consistent are the relationships among the observations, including topology?
    Data fall within expected ranges.

How can someone get a copy of the data set?

Are there legal restrictions on access or use of the data?
Access_Constraints: none
Use_Constraints:
USGS-authored or produced data and information are in the public domain from the U.S. Government and are freely redistributable with proper metadata and source attribution. Please recognize and acknowledge the U.S. Geological Survey as the originator(s) of the dataset and in products derived from these data.
  1. Who distributes the data set? (Distributor 1 of 1)
    U.S. Geological Survey - ScienceBase
    Denver Federal Center, Building 810, Mail Stop 302
    Denver, CO
    USA

    1-888-275-8747 (voice)
    sciencebase@usgs.gov
  2. What's the catalog number I need to order this data set? Downloadable time-series are in NetCDF format, containing all relevant metadata. Two zip files are available for download. The first contains continuous temperature and pressure observations recorded by each instrument at sites B1, B2, B3, B4, B5, and B6. The zip file contains a file for each instrument labeled by instrument location (XXb-cal.nc). The second zip contains wave conditions averaged over each 30-min interval. The zip file contains a single file for each instrument labeled similarly by location (XXs-a.nc). All metadata in NetCDF files is in EPIC-compliant format.
  3. What legal disclaimers am I supposed to read?
    Unless otherwise stated, all data, metadata and related materials are considered to satisfy the quality standards relative to the purpose for which the data were collected. Although these data and associated metadata have been reviewed for accuracy and completeness and approved for release by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), no warranty expressed or implied is made regarding the display or utility of the data on any other system or for general or scientific purposes, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty.
  4. How can I download or order the data?

Who wrote the metadata?

Dates:
Last modified: 13-Oct-2021
Metadata author:
U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center
Attn: PCMSC Science Data Coordinator
2885 Mission Street
Santa Cruz, CA

831-427-4747 (voice)
pcmsc_data@usgs.gov
Metadata standard:
Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata (FGDC-STD-001-1998)

This page is <https://cmgds.marine.usgs.gov/catalog/pcmsc/DataReleases/ScienceBase/DR_P9JZ5F00/bellinghambay_metadata.faq.html>
Generated by mp version 2.9.50 on Thu Oct 14 14:47:22 2021