Geology and geomorphology--Hueneme Canyon and Vicinity, California

Metadata also available as - [Outline] - [Parseable text] - [XML]

Frequently anticipated questions:

What does this data set describe?

Title:
Geology and geomorphology--Hueneme Canyon and Vicinity, California
Abstract:
This part of DS 781 presents data for the geologic and geomorphic map of the Hueneme Canyon and Vicinity map area, California. The vector data file is included in "Geology_HuenemeCanyon.zip," which is accessible from http://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/781/HuenemeCanyon/data_catalog_HuenemeCanyon.html. These data accompany the pamphlet and map sheets of Johnson, S.Y., Dartnell, P., Cochrane, G.R., Golden, N.E., Phillips, E.L., Ritchie, A.C., Kvitek, R.G., Greene, H.G., Krigsman, L.M., Endris, C.A., Clahan, K.B., Sliter, R.W., Wong, F.L., Yoklavich, M.M., and Normark, W.R. (S.Y. Johnson, ed.), 2012, California State Waters Map Series—-Hueneme Canyon and Vicinity, California: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3225, 41 p., 12 sheets, scale 1:24,000, https://pubs.usgs.gov/sim/3225/.
Marine geology and geomorphology was mapped in the Hueneme Canyon and Vicinity map area, California, from approximate Mean High Water (MHW) to the 3-nautical-mile limit of California's State Waters, and even farther offshore on the east and west flanks of Hueneme Canyon. Offshore geologic units were delineated on the basis of integrated analyses of adjacent onshore geology with multibeam bathymetry and backscatter imagery, seafloor-sediment and rock samples, digital camera and video imagery, and high-resolution seismic-reflection profiles.
Supplemental_Information:
Additional information about the field activities from which these data were derived is available online at:
https://cmgds.marine.usgs.gov/fan_info.php?fan=Z206SC https://cmgds.marine.usgs.gov/fan_info.php?fan=Z307SC https://cmgds.marine.usgs.gov/fan_info.php?fan=Z708SC
Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.
Although this Federal Geographic Data Committee-compliant metadata file is intended to document the data set in nonproprietary form, as well as in Esri format, this metadata file may include some Esri-specific terminology.
  1. How might this data set be cited?
    Ritchie, Andrew C., Johnson, Samuel Y., and Clahan, Kevin B., 2012, Geology and geomorphology--Hueneme Canyon and Vicinity, California: Data Series DS 781, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.

    Online Links:

    This is part of the following larger work.

    Golden, Nadine E., 2013, California State Waters Map Series Data Catalog: Data Series DS 781, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.

    Online Links:

  2. What geographic area does the data set cover?
    West_Bounding_Coordinate: -119.327981
    East_Bounding_Coordinate: -119.139726
    North_Bounding_Coordinate: 34.222958
    South_Bounding_Coordinate: 34.058412
  3. What does it look like?
    https://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/781/HuenemeCanyon/images/Geology_HuenemeCanyon.jpg (JPEG)
    image showing geology of Hueneme Canyon and Vicinity
  4. Does the data set describe conditions during a particular time period?
    Calendar_Date: 2012
    Currentness_Reference:
    Publication Date
  5. What is the general form of this data set?
    Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: vector digital data
  6. How does the data set represent geographic features?
    1. How are geographic features stored in the data set?
      This is a Vector data set. It contains the following vector data types (SDTS terminology):
      • GT-polygon composed of chains (298)
    2. What coordinate system is used to represent geographic features?
      The map projection used is WGS 1984 UTM Zone 11N.
      Projection parameters:
      Scale_Factor_at_Central_Meridian: 0.9996
      Longitude_of_Central_Meridian: -117.0
      Latitude_of_Projection_Origin: 0.0
      False_Easting: 500000.0
      False_Northing: 0.0
      Planar coordinates are encoded using coordinate pair
      Abscissae (x-coordinates) are specified to the nearest 0.0001
      Ordinates (y-coordinates) are specified to the nearest 0.0001
      Planar coordinates are specified in Meter
      The horizontal datum used is D WGS 1984.
      The ellipsoid used is WGS 1984.
      The semi-major axis of the ellipsoid used is 6378137.0.
      The flattening of the ellipsoid used is 1/298.257223563.
  7. How does the data set describe geographic features?
    MapUnitPolys
    Polygons representing geologic / geomorphic map units (Source: This report)
    OBJECTID
    Internal feature number. (Source: Esri) Sequential unique whole numbers that are automatically generated.
    Shape
    Feature geometry. (Source: Esri) Coordinates defining the features.
    MapUnitAbbrev
    Map Unit abbreviation (Source: This report)
    ValueDefinition
    afArtificial fill
    af?Artificial fill uncertain
    QccbSubmarine-canyon channel-flanking bar deposits
    QccfSubmarine-canyon channel-floor deposits
    QcchSubmarine-canyon channel-head deposits
    QccwSubmarine-canyon channel-wall deposits
    QcfaAxial-submarine-canyon fill
    QcflLateral-submarine-canyon fill
    QcftTributary-submarine-canyon fill
    QcwiInner submarine-canyon-wall deposits
    Qcwo1Outer submarine-canyon-wall deposits [generally sediment draped with 18 - 30 degree slope]
    Qcwo2Outer submarine-canyon-wall deposits [generally deeply incised and more than 30 degree slope]
    QlsLandslide deposits, undifferentiated
    Qls1Landslide deposits, first generation
    Qls2Landslide deposits, second generation
    Qls3Landslide deposits, third generation
    QlssSlump deposits on canyon walls
    QmpMarine pockmarks
    QmrMarine rill
    QmsMarine nearshore and shelf deposits
    QmshMarine shelf hummocky deposits
    QmslMarine slope deposits
    QmssMarine shelf scour depressions
    Qwp1Submerged wave-cut platform, about 120 to 125 m deep
    Qwp2Submerged wave-cut platform, about 95 to 100 m deep
    Qwp3Submerged wave-cut platform, about 75 to 85 m deep
    Qwp4Submerged wave-cut platform, about 65 m deep
    Qwpr1Submerged wave-cut platform riser, base about 120 to 125 m deep [associated with Qwp1]
    Qwpr2Submerged wave-cut platform riser, base about 95 to 100 m deep [associated with Qwp2]
    Qwpr3Submerged wave-cut platform riser, base about 75 to 85 m deep [associated with Qwp3]
    Qwpr4Submerged wave-cut platform riser, base about 65 m deep [associated with Qwp4]
    TbuBedrock, undivided
    MapUnit
    short description of map unit (Source: This report) text description of map unit
    Shape_Length
    Length of feature in internal units. (Source: Esri) Positive real numbers that are automatically generated.
    Shape_Area
    Area of feature in internal units squared. (Source: Esri) Positive real numbers that are automatically generated.
    RuleID
    Representation rule identifier (Source: This report) This field contains the representation rule in the ArcGIS file geodatabase which applies a solid color fill of a specified CMYK value to each polygon. Representation rules have the same name as the map unit abbreviation.

Who produced the data set?

  1. Who are the originators of the data set? (may include formal authors, digital compilers, and editors)
    • Andrew C. Ritchie
    • Samuel Y. Johnson
    • Kevin B. Clahan
  2. Who also contributed to the data set?
  3. To whom should users address questions about the data?
    U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center
    Attn: PCMSC Science Data Coordinator
    2885 Mission Street
    Santa Cruz, CA
    US

    831-427-4747 (voice)
    pcmsc_data@usgs.gov

Why was the data set created?

To expand geologic mapping to the seafloor within California's State Waters, to update coastal geologic mapping, and to contribute to a uniform regional geologic database. Additionally, to provide a geologic map for the public and geoscience community to aid in assessments and mitigation of geologic hazards in the Santa Barbara coastal plain region and to provide sufficient geologic information for land-use and land-management decisions both onshore and offshore.

How was the data set created?

  1. From what previous works were the data drawn?
    bathy (source 1 of 7)
    Dartnell, Peter, Phillips, Eleyne L., Ritchie, Andrew C., Kvitek, Rikk G., and Johnson, Samuel Y., 2012, Bathymetry--Hueneme Canyon and Vicinity, California: Data Series DS 781, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.

    Online Links:

    Type_of_Source_Media: digital file of gridded bathymetry data (ArcInfo GRID)
    Source_Contribution: Gridded bathymetry data used for interpretations.
    backscatterA (source 2 of 7)
    Dartnell, Peter, Phillips, Eleyne L., Ritchie, Andrew C., Kvitek, Rikk G., and Johnson, Samuel Y., 2012, Backscatter A [CSUMB]--Hueneme Canyon and Vicinity, California: Data Series DS 781, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.

    Online Links:

    Type_of_Source_Media: digital file of gridded amplitude data (ArcInfo GRID)
    Source_Contribution: Gridded backscatter data used for interpretations.
    backscatterB (source 3 of 7)
    Dartnell, Peter, Phillips, Eleyne L., Ritchie, Andrew C., Kvitek, Rikk G., and Johnson, Samuel Y., 2012, Backscatter B [USGS]--Hueneme Canyon and Vicinity, California: Data Series DS 781, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.

    Online Links:

    Type_of_Source_Media: digital file of gridded amplitude data (ArcInfo GRID)
    Source_Contribution: Gridded backscatter data used for interpretations.
    sediment (source 4 of 7)
    Reid, Jane A., Reid, Jamey M., Jenkins, Chris J., Zimmerman, Mark, Williams, S. Jeffress, and Field, Michael E., 2006, usSEABED—Pacific Coast (California, Oregon, Washington) offshore surficial-sediment data release: Data Series DS 182, U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA.

    Online Links:

    Type_of_Source_Media: Esri project files, csv files
    Source_Contribution:
    seafloor sediment and rock samples used to interpret seafloor geology
    imagery (source 5 of 7)
    Golden, Nadine E., and Cochran, Guy R., 2013, California Seafloor Mapping Program video and photograph portal: data release DOI:10.5066/F7J1015K, U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center, Santa Cruz, CA.

    Online Links:

    Type_of_Source_Media: seafloor video and photographs
    Source_Contribution:
    seafloor video and photographs used to interpret seafloor geology
    seismic (source 6 of 7)
    Sliter, Ray W., Triezenberg, Peter J., Hart, Patrick E., Draut, Amy E., Normark, William R., and Conrad, James E., 2008, High-resolution chirp and mini-sparker seismic-reflection data from the southern California continental shelf--Gaviota to Mugu Canyon: Open-File Report 2008-1246, U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA.

    Online Links:

    Type_of_Source_Media:
    seismic data files (.sgy files), ASCII lat/long shot point files, TIFF images of processed seismic lines
    Source_Contribution:
    Digital seismic data used to interpret subsurface geologic structure
    DEM (source 7 of 7)
    Barnard, Patrick L., and Hoover, Daniel, 2010, A seamless, high-resolution coastal digital elevation model (DEM) for southern California: Data Series 487, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.

    Online Links:

    Type_of_Source_Media: ARC ascii grids containing modeled elevation data
    Source_Contribution:
    elevation data used to fill gap between offshore and onshore data
  2. How were the data generated, processed, and modified?
    Date: 2010 (process 1 of 4)
    Map Unit polygons were digitized over underlying 2-meter base layers developed from multibeam bathymetry and backscatter data. Derivatives such as slope and curvature were generated from source rasters. Interpreted rasters include amplitude, hillshaded bathymetry (using various illumination angles and vertical exaggeration), slope, and curvature. Curvature was decomposed into profile and plan curvature for analysis purposes. Data sources used in this process:
    • bathy
    • backscatterA
    • backscatterB
    • sediment
    • imagery
    • seismic
    Data sources produced in this process:
    • offshore geology
    Date: 2011 (process 2 of 4)
    The mapped area was extended to the shoreline by generating a DEM using USACE NCMP lidar data collected in 2009 (USACE, unpub. data), with gaps filled by data from Barnard and Hoover (2010). These elevation data were then used to generate a shoreline at the NAVD88 +1.33 m contour, defined as the operational MHW shoreline by Weber and others (2005). The resulting boundary was transformed to WGS 84 UTM Zone 11 North in ArcGIS 10 using the NAD83 to WGS84 (ITRF00) transformation algorithm. This boundary was then used to extend and trim both onshore and offshore geology in the print and PDF product. The transformed boundary is contained within the WGS84 "contacts" feature class and identified as a shoreline in the associated representation rules.
    Only data for offshore map units are released digitally in this publication. For onshore geology of the area, see Clahan (2003).
    References Cited:
    Clahan, K.B., 2003, Geologic map of the Oxnard 7.5-minute quadrangle, Ventura Country, California: A Digital database, http://ngmdb.usgs.gov/Prodesc/proddesc_78382.htm California Geologic Survey, Preliminary Geologic Map, scale 1:24,000.
    Weber, K.M., List, J.H., Morgan, K.L., 2005, An operational Mean High Water datum for determination of shoreline position from topographic lidar data: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2005-1027 (https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20051027) Data sources used in this process:
    • offshore geology, DEM
    Date: 26-Sep-2018 (process 3 of 4)
    Metadata was modified to bring up to current USGS PCMSC standards. Information for accompanying Scientific Investigations Report added to Abstract and Cross Reference sections. Point of Contact information was updated. USGS Thesaurus and keywords were added, and Process Steps were refined. Details about different Network Resource Name links was given in the Access Instructions section. Phone number for Metadata Contact was corrected. Minor typos were corrected. No data information was changed. Person who carried out this activity:
    Susan A Cochran
    U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center
    2885 Mission St.
    Santa Cruz, CA
    United States

    831-460-7545 (voice)
    scochran@usgs.gov
    Date: 19-Oct-2020 (process 4 of 4)
    Edited metadata to add keywords section with USGS persistent identifier as theme keyword. No data were changed. Person who carried out this activity:
    U.S. Geological Survey
    Attn: VeeAnn A. Cross
    Marine Geologist
    384 Woods Hole Road
    Woods Hole, MA

    508-548-8700 x2251 (voice)
    508-457-2310 (FAX)
    vatnipp@usgs.gov
  3. What similar or related data should the user be aware of?
    Johnson, Samuel Y., Dartnell, Peter, Cochrane, Guy R., Golden, Nadine E., Phillips, Eleyne L., Ritchie, Andrew C., Kvitek, Rikk G., Greeene, H. Gary, Krigsman, Lisa M., Endris, Charles A., Clahan, Kevin B., Sliter, Ray W., Wong, Florence L., Yoklavich, Mary M., and Normark, William R., 2012, California State Waters Map Series--Hueneme Canyon and Vicinity, California: Scientific Investigations Map 3225, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.

    Online Links:

How reliable are the data; what problems remain in the data set?

  1. How well have the observations been checked?
  2. How accurate are the geographic locations?
    Polygons were primarily mapped by one of the following methods: (1) interpretation of 2-meter-resolution bathymetry data; (2) interpretation of 2-meter-resolution backscatter data; (3) interpretation of 2-meter slope and curvature derivatives of bathymetry data; and (4) interpretation of seismic-reflection-profile data. Map Unit contact locations were interpreted typically at a scale of between 1:1,000 and 1:2,000 using the above base data. Bathymetric sonar and LiDAR data have a horizontal accuracy greater than the resolution of the base data. Map unit contacts were digitized by heads-up screen digitization of line data on 2-meter-resolution DEMs described above. Horizontal accuracy is estimated to be between 2 and 5 meters depending on how clearly contacts can be resolved. Most digitized positions on the map are estimated to have better than 5 m horizontal accuracy. There is no elevation data in the database.
  3. How accurate are the heights or depths?
  4. Where are the gaps in the data? What is missing?
    Data are complete. No offshore features that could be accurately identified and represented at the compilation scale of 1:24,000 were eliminated or generalized. The smallest area represented is approximately 100 square meters. All geospatial database elements are attributed.
  5. How consistent are the relationships among the observations, including topology?
    Map elements were visually checked for overshoots, undershoots, duplicate features, and other errors by the lead authors and by the GIS technician(s) who created the digital database. Review drafts of the map were reviewed internally by at least two other geologists for consistency with basic geologic principles and general conformity to USGS mapping standards.

How can someone get a copy of the data set?

Are there legal restrictions on access or use of the data?
Access_Constraints: none
Use_Constraints:
USGS-authored or produced data and information are in the public domain from the U.S. Government and are freely redistributable with proper metadata and source attribution. Please recognize and acknowledge the U.S. Geological Survey as the originator(s) of the dataset and in products derived from these data. This information is not intended for navigation purposes.
  1. Who distributes the data set? (Distributor 1 of 1)
    U.S. Geological Survey
    345 Middlefield Rd
    Menlo Park, CA
    USA

    (650) 329-4309 (voice)
  2. What's the catalog number I need to order this data set? The .zip file (Geology_HuenemeCanyon.zip) includes the .aux, .dbf, .shp, .shx, .sbx, and .sbn files, as well as FGDC-compliant metadata for the geology data layer of Hueneme Canyon and Vicinity, California.
  3. What legal disclaimers am I supposed to read?
    Unless otherwise stated, all data, metadata and related materials are considered to satisfy the quality standards relative to the purpose for which the data were collected. Although these data and associated metadata have been reviewed for accuracy and completeness and approved for release by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), no warranty expressed or implied is made regarding the display or utility of the data on any other system or for general or scientific purposes, nor shall the act of distribution constitute any such warranty.
  4. How can I download or order the data?
  5. What hardware or software do I need in order to use the data set?
    The downloadable data file has been compressed with the "zip" command and can be unzipped with Winzip (or other tool) on Windows systems. To utilize these data, the user must have software capable of uncompressing the WinZip file and importing and viewing an Esri ArcMap TIFF. Users should download the ArcGIS Project File, HuenemeCanyonGIS.mxd.zip, a compressed (with the "zip" command) version of the ArcMap document (.mxd) that has all the data layers loaded in the table of contents for "Hueneme Canyon and Vicinity" and has all the data symbolized as on the map sheets. Download and save this ArcGIS project file, including all data layers, to the directory the user has created for this GIS.

Who wrote the metadata?

Dates:
Last modified: 19-Oct-2020
Metadata author:
U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center
Attn: PCMSC Science Data Coordinator
2885 Mission Street
Santa Cruz, CA
US

831-427-4747 (voice)
pcmsc_data@usgs.gov
Metadata standard:
Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata (FGDC-STD-001-1998)
This page is <https://cmgds.marine.usgs.gov/catalog/pcmsc/SeriesReports/DS_DDS/DS_781/HuenemeCanyon/Geology_HuenemeCanyon_metadata.faq.html>
Generated by mp version 2.9.50 on Thu Nov 18 14:01:13 2021